Teams

TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick

2023 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

21 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-03-05vs MIT:Nice Aces:PospisilLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Marykate Root vs Kristin Daley / Lynn Siebert7-5, 5-5
L#2 DoublesSarah Hottois / Polly Edwards vs Kirsten Page / Kristen Doyle4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Ellen O'Donnell vs Erzsebet Pusztai / Mari Ullyett2-6, 2-6
2023-02-26vs GF:Wise Aces:Barnes/PonvertWon 21
L#1 DoublesSalam Turki / Claudia Lacasia vs Serena Crawford / Celia Ponvert4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Zubrinsky / Sue Broderick vs Mary Barnes / Barbara Frisbie7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllen O'Donnell / Karen Cushnie vs Catherine Dinauer / Jennifer Young4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-12vs MIT:Nice Aces:PospisilLost 13
L#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Claudia Lacasia vs Kristin Daley / Kristen Doyle4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHetal Kocinsky vs Kimberly Nyklicek6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoyce Somers / Dorothy Spenner vs Erzsebet Pusztai / Judit Farkas6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Hutchins / Jane Kim vs Diana Caty / Graziana Weill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-29vs MIT:40 BBs:DeAngelisWon 10
W#1 DoublesPolly Edwards / Sarah Hottois vs Michele Palanzo / Kristin Sabatini6-2, 6-5
2023-01-15vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJane Kim / Dorothy Spenner vs Tiffany Bevacqua / Kelly Thomas1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHetal Kocinsky vs Monica Young6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Joyce Somers vs Carole Allers / Fiona Strachan6-7, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJill Bakken / Barbara Hutchins vs Mallory Close / ADRIENNE FULK1-6, 0-6
2022-12-18vs KH:Always Be Closing:Ryan/ScherwinLost 13
W#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Sue Broderick vs Erin Harris / Christina Scherwin6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSalam Turki vs Cintia Shiro6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRosemary Klein / Hetal Kocinsky vs Jennifer Dellacroce / Melani Lust4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Bakken / Deirdre Andreoli vs Monica Ryan / Sharon Casey6-3, 6-7
L#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Erin Harris / Cintia Shiro6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Hottois / Marykate Root vs Monica Ryan / Christina Scherwin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRosemary Klein / Hetal Kocinsky vs Kelly Genova / Amy Margulies6-3, 6-4
2022-12-04vs KH:New Ad-Itudes:BrownWon 31
L#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Salam Turki vs Tiffany Bevacqua / Kelly Thomas2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesHetal Kocinsky vs Monica Young6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPolly Edwards / Sarah Hottois vs Wendy Hyer / Genevieve Pettinato5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Jane Kim vs Kendal Gaillard / Claire Londa7-6, 6-2
2022-11-05vs GF:Wise Aces:Barnes/PonvertSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Mary Zubrinsky vs Teresa Panico / Dani Woods7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPolly Edwards vs Jensa Morris6-4, 5-2
L#2 DoublesJoyce Somers / Dorothy Spenner vs Pamelia Parker / Mary Barnes6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMisao Naito / Barbara Hutchins vs Sharon Marczewski / Sue Walden4-6, 4-6
2022-10-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Polly Edwards vs Ann Garvey / Jennifer Driscoll6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W - 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Suzanne Crowe
published
3.87
Claudia Lacasia
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.84
Polly Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.83
Sarah Hottois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Salam Turki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.76
Sue Broderick
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Barbara Hutchins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Hetal Kocinsky
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Karen Cushnie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Mary Zubrinsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Rosemary Klein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Deirdre Andreoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Gillian Sizer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Ellen O'Donnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Dorothy Spenner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Joyce Somers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cher Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Misao Naito
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jane Kim
published
Jill Bakken
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marykate Root
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marykate Root + Jane Kim17067% games+17.0% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Marykate Root6070% games+12.6% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Claudia Lacasia1551% games+6.7% vs expected
Misao Naito + Rosemary Klein4549% games+6.2% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Rosemary Klein10658% games+5.0% vs expected
Sarah Hottois + Sue Broderick8460% games+4.3% vs expected
Claudia Lacasia + Deirdre Andreoli10654% games+3.5% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Mary Zubrinsky311554% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Crowe
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Claudia Lacasia
154W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Polly Edwards
172W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
Sarah Hottois
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Salam Turki
93W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Sue Broderick
149W–98L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Barbara Hutchins
26W–29L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hetal Kocinsky
50W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Karen Cushnie
80W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
Mary Zubrinsky
57W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Rosemary Klein
46W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Deirdre Andreoli
42W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Gillian Sizer
80W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Ellen O'Donnell
98W–121L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Dorothy Spenner
150W–174L career · 3 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
Joyce Somers
59W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Cher Anderson
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Misao Naito
38W–63L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jane Kim
124W–58L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Bakken
31W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marykate Root
58W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.