Teams

Team 2 Sassy Strings

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-15vs Team 1 The 40 LovesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Jairam / Jodi Seth vs Karen Boulineaux / Miriam Smolen6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAida Blumen / Monica Popp vs Elizabeth Gay / Patricia Michel-Vargas6-1, 6-2
2022-02-02vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Djorup / Monica Popp vs Celeste Linthicum / Shelley Owens2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Joi Ruther6-3, 2-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Polly / Jodi Seth vs Carey Mottet / Yolanda Tsai2-6, 0-6
2022-01-23vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMonica Popp / Jodi Seth vs Patricia Hathaway / Celeste Linthicum0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Houston / Laura Jairam vs Shelley Owens / Joi Ruther4-6, 1-6
2022-01-21vs Team 1 The 40 LovesLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Houston / Jodi Seth vs Joyce Aramburu / Miriam Smolen4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Popp vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Djorup / Laura Jairam vs Narae Choi / Patricia Michel-Vargas7-5, 4-4
2022-01-09vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Jairam / Misty Jordan vs Sandra Kim / Shelley Owens2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMonica Popp vs Joi Ruther6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-01-08vs Team 1 The 40 LovesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy King / Jodi Seth vs Miriam Smolen / Joyce Aramburu4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.49
Laura Jairam
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Anhvinh Wright
published 3.5
3.31
Monica Popp
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.50
Misty Jordan
published
2.46
Jodi Seth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Seth + Laura Jairam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Laura Jairam
184W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Anhvinh Wright
64W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Monica Popp
75W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Misty Jordan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Jodi Seth
41W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.