Teams

A18 4.0M LT2 Garst

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-14vs A18 4.0M NC2 PaulinoLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Garst / Daniel Chirayath vs Daren Rosenberger / Brian Hass2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLee Sulzener / Scott Bunge vs Wilfred Santos / Philip Canadas5-7, 2-6
2024-03-23vs A18 4.0M NC1 OttoLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Sulzener / Christopher Buford vs Dhiego Bastos / Jason Otto3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Kenyhercz vs Dan Ritchey4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-16vs A18 4.0M TP FarrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Buford / Lee Sulzener vs Raj Patel / Dan Fearer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesScott Bunge vs Bobby Harmon1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDaniel Chirayath / Seth Vilensky vs Robert Farrell / Hassan Malik5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-09vs A18 4.0M LT1 CrawleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Buford / Brendan Ho vs Douglas Snider / Stephen Radachi4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesScott Bunge vs Willard Greenwood1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLee Sulzener / Daniel Chirayath vs Stephen DeBacco / Mabruk Quabili5-7, 4-6
2024-03-02vs A18 4.0M NC2 PaulinoLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Buford / Lee Sulzener vs William Burnett / Michael Williams2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesScott Bunge vs Brian Hass6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Kramer / Daniel Chirayath vs Wilfred Santos / Philip Canadas1-6, 1-6
2024-02-10vs A18 4.0M NC1 OttoLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Buford / Lee Sulzener vs David Currier / Michael Jackson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesScott Bunge vs Chad Vogelgesang1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Garst / Michael Kramer vs Dan Ritchey / Jason Otto2-6, 2-6
2024-02-03vs A18 4.0M TP FarrellLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Buford / Daniel Chirayath vs Josh Derrig / Robert Farrell3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWilliam Kenyhercz vs Bobby Harmon4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRyan Garst / Seth Vilensky vs Nathan Fisher / Andrew Leffler4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 4.0M LT1 Crawley8020410138
2A18 4.0M MV Stephans73181230263
3A18 4.0M MM2 Burnoski73171330258
4A18 4.0M NC2 Paulino5315920185
5A18 4.0M NC1 Otto5315923181
6A18 4.0M MM3 Dorsch55171332274
7A18 4.0M PW Rickard46141637291
8A18 4.0M MM1 Benny46131739292
9A18 4.0M WE Clegg37111944314
10A18 4.0M TP Farrell1771736260
11A18 4.0M LT2 Garst1732145284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Christopher Buford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Brendan Ho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Seth Vilensky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Lee Sulzener
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.26
Daniel Chirayath
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
William Kenyhercz
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.25
Scott Bunge
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Doug Wirt
published 3.5
3.19
Ryan Garst
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michael Kramer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Kramer + Daniel Chirayath3550% games+2.7% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Michael Kramer5747% games+2.4% vs expected
Michael Kramer + Christopher Buford8554% games+0.5% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Daniel Chirayath241753% games−0.7% vs expected
Daniel Chirayath + Christopher Buford5452% games−1.3% vs expected
Seth Vilensky + Ryan Garst4258% games−2.4% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Lee Sulzener4253% games−5.2% vs expected
Seth Vilensky + Michael Kramer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Buford
92W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Brendan Ho
31W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Seth Vilensky
59W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lee Sulzener
81W–52L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Daniel Chirayath
112W–93L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
William Kenyhercz
25W–15L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Scott Bunge
10W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Doug Wirt
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Ryan Garst
129W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Michael Kramer
92W–58L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.