Teams

A18 4.0M NC1 Otto

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Spring

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-13vs A18 4.0M LT1 CrawleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesChad Vogelgesang / Todd Kolarik vs JOSHUA KHAVARI / Akin Fashina1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJason Otto / David Currier vs Adam Fye / Ryoichi Fujiwara6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-23vs A18 4.0M LT2 GarstWon 20
W#1 DoublesDhiego Bastos / Jason Otto vs Lee Sulzener / Christopher Buford6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDan Ritchey vs William Kenyhercz6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-09vs A18 4.0M TP FarrellWon 20
W#1 DoublesChad Vogelgesang / David Currier vs Robert Farrell / Hassan Malik6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Otto / Dan Ritchey vs Bobby Harmon / Nathan Fisher4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-02vs A18 4.0M LT1 CrawleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesChad Vogelgesang / Michael Jackson vs Akin Fashina / Matthew Jeffries2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Cremer vs Stephen DeBacco6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTodd Kolarik / Dan Ritchey vs Stephen Radachi / Douglas Snider1-6, 2-6
2024-03-01vs A18 4.0M NC2 PaulinoLost 12
W#1 DoublesChad Vogelgesang / Michael Jackson vs Michael Williams / Daren Rosenberger0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Cremer vs Curtis Wagner3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDan Ritchey / Jason Otto vs William Burnett / Wilfred Santos6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-02-17vs A18 4.0M NC2 PaulinoWon 21
W#1 DoublesDouglas Kolarik / Todd Kolarik vs Brian Hass / Daren Rosenberger6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Cremer vs Curtis Wagner2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Jackson / Dhiego Bastos vs William Burnett / Michael Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-10vs A18 4.0M LT2 GarstWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Currier / Michael Jackson vs Christopher Buford / Lee Sulzener7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChad Vogelgesang vs Scott Bunge6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDan Ritchey / Jason Otto vs Ryan Garst / Michael Kramer6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 4.0M LT1 Crawley8020410138
2A18 4.0M MV Stephans73181230263
3A18 4.0M MM2 Burnoski73171330258
4A18 4.0M NC2 Paulino5315920185
5A18 4.0M NC1 Otto5315923181
6A18 4.0M MM3 Dorsch55171332274
7A18 4.0M PW Rickard46141637291
8A18 4.0M MM1 Benny46131739292
9A18 4.0M WE Clegg37111944314
10A18 4.0M TP Farrell1771736260
11A18 4.0M LT2 Garst1732145284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Chad Vogelgesang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
Dhiego Bastos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Dan Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.53
David Currier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Todd Kolarik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Jason Otto
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Douglas Kolarik
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Michael Cremer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Kolarik + Todd Kolarik17264% games+9.8% vs expected
Chad Vogelgesang + David Currier8460% games+8.5% vs expected
Chad Vogelgesang + Todd Kolarik171550% games+1.4% vs expected
Chad Vogelgesang + Douglas Kolarik21361% games+0.4% vs expected
Todd Kolarik + David Currier2351% gamesnot enough data
Jason Otto + Dan Ritchey4162% gamesnot enough data
Jason Otto + David Currier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad Vogelgesang
114W–60L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Dhiego Bastos
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dan Ritchey
66W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
David Currier
97W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Todd Kolarik
67W–58L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.36
Jason Otto
40W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.22
Douglas Kolarik
85W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Cremer
61W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.