Teams

CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Wheaton (Out) Robinson Sat 4 $17

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesQuinton Osborne / Michael Grantham vs Brad Smith / Michael Baddeloo5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTed Romaine vs Scott Williford6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnders Singdahlsen / Glenn Evans vs Jordan Goldstein / Jaime Acosta7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Exner / Claude Cimino vs Trevor DeSilva / Eric H Lo2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTed Romaine vs Aleksandr Kolomiets7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Exner / Glenn Evans vs Raymond Kwong / Nick Werth6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesQuinton Osborne / Nick Rost vs Zach Atzen / Russell Needler6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Anders Singdahlsen vs Dennis Kontorovich / Arjun Murthy6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Exner / Joshua Luetkehans vs Aleksandrs Kublinskis / John Mysz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesQuinton Osborne / Erik Halperin vs Brad Wilson / Brian Thomason4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClaude Cimino / Mark Exner vs Douglas Weber / Thomas Tranter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTed Romaine vs Darren Olson6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnders Singdahlsen / Glenn Evans vs Wesley Ruggles / John Smith7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Joshua Luetkehans vs Kevin Kamenjarin / Shashank Saxena6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDaniel Nielson vs Yuto Tsukida6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErik Halperin / Michael Grantham vs Eddie DeLaCruz / Tyrin Wages6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesQuinton Osborne / Mark Exner vs Jeffrey Zucchi / Tommy Shuff1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Waveland (Out) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1070231227244
2CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Wheaton (Out) Robinson Sat 4 $1752241126221
3CDTA S 18&O 4.5M River Trails Tranter Thurs 7 $2052231227233
4CDTA S 18&O 4.5M S Barrington Douglass Sun 6 $2043181739304
5CDTA S 18&O 4.5M North Shore Sternfield Sat 4 $2034201532273
6CDTA S 18&O 4.5M MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $252492144299
7CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Naperville Schmidt Thurs 7 $2015111939262
8CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Tam Needler Wed 7 $220762961385

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Zsolt Juhasz
published
4.41
Joshua Luetkehans
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.35
Tyler Hogan
published
4.33
Ted Romaine
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Anders Singdahlsen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Claude Cimino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Erik Halperin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Mark Exner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.00
Glenn Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Daniel Nielson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Michael Grantham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nick Rost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Quinton Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Whitney Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Grantham + Mark Exner141050% games+1.0% vs expected
Claude Cimino + Michael Grantham5756% gamesnot enough data
Claude Cimino + Joshua Luetkehans8362% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Michael Grantham4256% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Mark Exner5158% gamesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Mark Exner4256% gamesnot enough data
Michael Grantham + Zsolt Juhasz5165% gamesnot enough data
Claude Cimino + Mark Exner2341% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zsolt Juhasz
50W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
4.42
Joshua Luetkehans
56W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
Tyler Hogan
43W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.35
Ted Romaine
41W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Anders Singdahlsen
6W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Claude Cimino
43W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Erik Halperin
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Mark Exner
74W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Glenn Evans
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
4.00
Daniel Nielson
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michael Grantham
39W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Rost
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Quinton Osborne
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Whitney Brooks
15W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.