Teams

CDTA S 18&O 4.5M North Shore Sternfield Sat 4 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesBrad Smith / Michael Baddeloo vs Quinton Osborne / Michael Grantham7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesScott Williford vs Ted Romaine3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Goldstein / Jaime Acosta vs Anders Singdahlsen / Glenn Evans6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTrevor DeSilva / Eric H Lo vs Mark Exner / Claude Cimino6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesHan Han / Michael Sims vs Jeffrey Zucchi / Tommy Shuff3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoseph Zabat vs Warren San Luis4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEric H Lo / Michael Baddeloo vs Dimitar Ginev / Yuto Tsukida6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesScott Bondurant / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Andrew Wolfberg / Kevin Zimmerman7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJoseph Zabat vs George Ciuca2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHan Han / Michael Sims vs Rod Wienke / Mariano Suarez7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichael Baddeloo vs Jean Michel Dos Remedios5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEric H Lo / Edwin Baldwin vs Brian Thomason / Adrian Ciuca1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHan Han / Michael Baddeloo vs Giann Meletto / Joseph Shmigelsky7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEdwin Baldwin / Jordan Goldstein vs Mariusz Biernacki / Aleksandrs Kublinskis7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesScott Bondurant / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Andrew Mabadi / Harrison Soegiarto7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Sternfield vs Adam Davis2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJordan Goldstein / Michael Sims vs Justin Hetler / David Polmer6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEdwin Baldwin / Eric H Lo vs Cole Heule / Donald Brown4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDanny Resnick / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Brian Hanus / Jonathon Schmidt6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHan Han vs Craig Keuer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJerry Morse-Karzen / Jaime Acosta vs Lubos Vegh / John Laurx6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGary Gerstman / Brad Smith vs William Schmitt / John Li6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Waveland (Out) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1070231227244
2CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Wheaton (Out) Robinson Sat 4 $1752241126221
3CDTA S 18&O 4.5M River Trails Tranter Thurs 7 $2052231227233
4CDTA S 18&O 4.5M S Barrington Douglass Sun 6 $2043181739304
5CDTA S 18&O 4.5M North Shore Sternfield Sat 4 $2034201532273
6CDTA S 18&O 4.5M MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $252492144299
7CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Naperville Schmidt Thurs 7 $2015111939262
8CDTA S 18&O 4.5M Tam Needler Wed 7 $220762961385

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Michael Baddeloo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.28
Han Han
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Danny Resnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Gary Gerstman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Scott Williford
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.11
Nick Charlton-Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Eric H Lo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Daniel Sternfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Edwin Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jerry Morse-Karzen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Goldstein
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Zabat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Trevor DeSilva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Baddeloo + Nick Charlton-Perrin6256% games−0.4% vs expected
Edwin Baldwin + Daniel Sternfield1634% games−12.4% vs expected
Trevor DeSilva + Edwin Baldwin5350% gamesnot enough data
Michael Baddeloo + Eric H Lo1449% gamesnot enough data
Nick Charlton-Perrin + Eric H Lo3248% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Baldwin + Eric H Lo044 matchesnot enough data
Danny Resnick + Nick Charlton-Perrin123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Baddeloo + Edwin Baldwin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Baddeloo
42W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Han Han
107W–85L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Danny Resnick
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gary Gerstman
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Scott Williford
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
Nick Charlton-Perrin
34W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Eric H Lo
18W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Daniel Sternfield
9W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.87
4
Edwin Baldwin
17W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jerry Morse-Karzen
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Goldstein
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Zabat
67W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Trevor DeSilva
25W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.