Teams

MD.Winters

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-05vs LOCH.PeltSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Wendy Hanshew7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKaren Merchant vs KAREN CROW4-6, 0-6
2024-11-22vs TING.ClaussonWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrigette Flower vs Cary Armstrong2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Rachel McLean6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Rebecca Kotcher6-3, 6-4
2024-11-07vs LOCH.PeltWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Kathleen Murray4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Stephannie Messina2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKaren Merchant vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-29vs LOCH.PeltWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Kristine Pelt6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs KAREN CROW6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Michelle Hoyles3-6, 3-6
2024-10-24vs TING.ClaussonWon 21
L#1 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Cary Armstrong3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKaren Merchant vs Rebecca Kotcher6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Tracy Lowrance6-1, 6-3
2024-10-22vs LOCH.PeltWon 21
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Kathleen Murray6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Michelle Hoyles3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesShari McCandlish vs Jennifer Locklear5-7, 3-6
2024-10-14vs TING.ClaussonWon 20
W#1 SinglesAllie Ligay vs Colleen Sacco6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKaren Merchant vs Rachel McLean6-1, 7-5
2024-10-10vs TING.ClaussonWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Winters vs Erika Clausson6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKaren Merchant vs Colleen Sacco6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Brigette Flower
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Allie Ligay
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Lindsay Winters
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Karen Merchant
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.87
Shari McCandlish
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Ligay + Lindsay Winters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brigette Flower
179W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Allie Ligay
203W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Lindsay Winters
84W–47L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Karen Merchant
87W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Shari McCandlish
82W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.