Teams

LOCH.Pelt

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-05vs MD.WintersLost 01
L#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Allie Ligay5-7, 2-6
2024-11-18vs TING.ClaussonLost 12
L#1 SinglesWendy Hanshew vs Kara Horton0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Colleen Sacco7-5, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Karen Johnston1-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs MD.WintersWon 10
W#2 SinglesStephannie Messina vs Shari McCandlish2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-04vs TING.ClaussonLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Karen Johnston3-6, 5-7
2024-10-29vs MD.WintersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Allie Ligay2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Shari McCandlish6-3, 6-3
2024-10-22vs MD.WintersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMichelle Hoyles vs Lindsay Winters6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Shari McCandlish7-5, 6-3
2024-10-10vs TING.ClaussonLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristine Pelt vs Cary Armstrong3-6, 4-6
2024-09-24vs TING.ClaussonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Locklear vs Kara Horton5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesStephannie Messina vs Erika Clausson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Jennifer Locklear
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Wendy Hanshew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Kristine Pelt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Kathleen Murray
published
3.23
Stephannie Messina
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Michelle Hoyles
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Sharon Poindexter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Pelt + Jennifer Locklear5162% games+9.3% vs expected
Michelle Hoyles + Kristine Pelt6847% games−0.9% vs expected
Wendy Hanshew + Kristine Pelt4453% games−3.7% vs expected
Michelle Hoyles + Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat2444% games−4.8% vs expected
Wendy Hanshew + Michelle Hoyles1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Locklear
96W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Wendy Hanshew
111W–144L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Kristine Pelt
154W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Kathleen Murray
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Stephannie Messina
121W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Michelle Hoyles
126W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.