Teams

SFV LLW - Kate's Pyle Drivers

2023 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-17vs SFV - Spring Vamos!Won 10
W#1 SinglesJennifer Cotone Gossett vs Wenli Chen6-1, 6-1
2023-05-07vs SFV - Hit t'GDB! - Spring 2023Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cotone Gossett / Lily Wu vs Leticia Alcala / Kathrina Cruz3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-29vs SFV - Hit t'GDB! - Spring 2023Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cotone Gossett / Emily Werman vs Mary Soto / Loretta Peng6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
Christina Markey
published 4.5
4.24
Shanna Reznik
published
4.21
Felicity Flesher
published 4.5
4.20
Jennifer Day
published
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
4.07
Michelle L Hughes
published
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
published
3.89
Katherine Pyle
published
3.87
Jill Bauman
published
3.77
Karin Hoesli
published
3.75
Debie Marsden
published 4
3.74
Lena Bouton
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trish Halamandaris + Katherine Pyle123 matchesnot enough data
Debie Marsden + Karin Hoesli303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
131W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.73
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Christina Markey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shanna Reznik
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Felicity Flesher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
Jennifer Day
23W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.09
Michelle L Hughes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
4.07
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
Trish Halamandaris
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.96
Katherine Pyle
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.89
Jill Bauman
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
Karin Hoesli
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debie Marsden
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Lena Bouton
81W–62L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.