Teams

STSC-Reid

2024 ADULT 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-17vs ATFC-TopspinstersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKimberley Boman / Stephenie Tucker vs Denise Poisson / Anita Phillips6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnne Bauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Greer / Gloria Flager vs Christie Chiang / Dana Brad7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Katter / Kirsten Collins vs Carol Glud / Gina Marcus7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-16vs ACB-Double the FunLost 13
W#1 DoublesStephenie Tucker / Jill Ainsworth vs Nicole Loeffler / Ann Lewis6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKelly Greer vs Charlene Small3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Flager / Lisa Reid vs Lisa Johannessen / Helen Silfven6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Chamberlain / Ruth Katter vs Stephanie Nelson / Jennifer Wolt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-16vs ESTC-The Daily BagelSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJill Ainsworth / Lisa Reid vs Christina Spencer / Radona Peterson6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAnne Bauer vs Celeste Sather0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberley Boman / Stephenie Tucker vs Ashley Backlund / Evangeline Laurie6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNancy Chamberlain / Kirsten Collins vs Ann Posen / Lindsey Poulsen3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACB-Double the Fun308410100
2EYMCA-Eugene YMCA317919149
3ESTC-The Daily Bagel216614105
4S OR-STSC-Stahl227921149
5STSC-Reid12571498
6ESTC-Fireballs1310615137
7ATFC-Topspinsters035717131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Gloria Flager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephenie Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Jill Ainsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Kimberley Boman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Reid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Kelly Greer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Anne Bauer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Kirsten Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth Katter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Reid + Stephenie Tucker6354% games+12.5% vs expected
Stephenie Tucker + Kimberley Boman101051% games−0.4% vs expected
Jill Ainsworth + Kimberley Boman22955% games−1.9% vs expected
Ruth Katter + Nancy Chamberlain2839% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Jill Ainsworth6072% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Katter + Kirsten Collins1434% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Gloria Flager3258% gamesnot enough data
Stephenie Tucker + Nancy Chamberlain044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gloria Flager
104W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Stephenie Tucker
94W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Jill Ainsworth
51W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Kimberley Boman
71W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Lisa Reid
64W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Kelly Greer
38W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Anne Bauer
29W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Kirsten Collins
21W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Nancy Chamberlain
15W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruth Katter
20W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.