Teams

SSH YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-01vs LTFC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Marcy MacDonnell vs Melissa Griese / Lori Benson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Shipp / Martha Williams vs Kate Becker / Therese Paranka6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Catherine Corbett vs Juliet Beckman / Kristi Savignano3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRita Lochhead / Martha Peck vs Katie Deline / Julie Wilson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-17vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Marcy MacDonnell vs Heidi Dery / Claire Ehrlich7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Cindy McLemore vs Cyndy Besselievre / Karen Greenwood7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Peck / Nancy Shipp vs Barbara Everard / Lora Quirk6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-10vs CR NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Marcy MacDonnell vs Debra Faricy / Deborah Jones4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRita Lochhead / Cindy McLemore vs Kimberly Davis / Moira Smith2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Nancy Shipp vs Catherine Dunbar / Karla Hansen Adkison7-6, 6-4
L#1 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Kristin Warren vs Deoni Levy / Amy Hand1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCindy McLemore / Martha Williams vs Jacquelyn Deyoung-Boyle / Sandra Cranston3-6, 2-6
2022-06-03vs SSLT ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Catherine Corbett vs Leslie Hanna / Michelle Miller6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRita Lochhead / Cindy McLemore vs Susan Marshall / Kristen Tourangeau1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Peck / Martha Williams vs Kristen Padberg / Leslie Garson-Wright3-6, 3-6
2022-05-27vs LTFC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Kristin Warren vs Katherine Hahn / Melissa Griese6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRita Lochhead / Martha Peck vs Sherry Ertelt / Carol Jochens2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy McLemore / Martha Williams vs Lori Benson / Rebecca Pulick1-6, 3-6
2022-05-13vs NJ BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesKristin Warren / Catherine Corbett vs Cyndy Besselievre / Victoria Barstow6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy McLemore / Rita Lochhead vs Charlene Bailey / Lora Quirk6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartha Williams / Marcy MacDonnell vs Barbara Everard / Regina Bock2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-06vs CR NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Williams / Kathy Anselmo vs Jennifer Liebowitz / Deborah Jones2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Schott / Rita Lochhead vs Sarah Marr / Moira Smith4-6, 3-6
2022-04-29vs SSLT ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Corbett / Kristin Warren vs Leslie Hanna / Michelle Miller6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Karen Schott vs Susan Marshall / Kristen Tourangeau4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy McLemore / Marcy MacDonnell vs Leslie Garson-Wright / Kristen Padberg0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Ginger Phillips
published 4.5
Cindy McLemore
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.13
Kathy Anselmo
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.57
Catherine Corbett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.54
Martha Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Karen Schott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Warren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marcy MacDonnell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Martha Peck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Shipp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rita Lochhead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Corbett + Kristin Warren4160% games+1.2% vs expected
Marcy MacDonnell + Kathy Anselmo4252% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Corbett + Cindy McLemore123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Corbett + Kathy Anselmo213 matchesnot enough data
Cindy McLemore + Rita Lochhead033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ginger Phillips
34W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
4.55
4.5
Cindy McLemore
14W–19L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Anselmo
40W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Catherine Corbett
59W–31L career · 8 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Martha Williams
21W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Karen Schott
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Warren
26W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcy MacDonnell
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Peck
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Shipp
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rita Lochhead
1W–6L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.