Teams

LTFC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-01vs SSH YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Griese / Lori Benson vs Kathy Anselmo / Marcy MacDonnell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Becker / Therese Paranka vs Nancy Shipp / Martha Williams3-6, 2-6
2022-06-24vs NJ BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Jochens / Rebecca Pulick vs Regina Bock / Lora Quirk6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Geist / Lori Benson vs Heidi Dery / Karen Greenwood6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Ertelt / Katherine Hahn vs Claire Ehrlich / Charlene Bailey6-3, 6-4
2022-06-17vs CR NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Griese / Carol Jochens vs Moira Smith / Kimberly Davis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Geist / Katherine Hahn vs Catherine Dunbar / Sarah Marr3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Becker / Lori Benson vs Karla Hansen Adkison / Jennifer Liebowitz4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-10vs SSLT ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Benson / Katherine Hahn vs Peggy Seyfert / Nancy Engard6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTherese Paranka / Melissa Griese vs Leslie Hanna / Heather Reimann3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKate Becker / Jill Geist vs Clare Morey / Julie Lang2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesLori Benson / Therese Paranka vs Deoni Levy / Julie Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Geist / Rebecca Pulick vs Jacquelyn Deyoung-Boyle / Katie Deline2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSherry Ertelt / Carol Jochens vs Juliet Beckman / Michelle McDonough6-3, 7-5
2022-05-27vs SSH YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatherine Hahn / Melissa Griese vs Catherine Corbett / Kristin Warren3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Ertelt / Carol Jochens vs Rita Lochhead / Martha Peck6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Benson / Rebecca Pulick vs Cindy McLemore / Martha Williams6-1, 6-3
2022-05-20vs NJ BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Griese / Carol Jochens vs Barbara Everard / Lora Quirk7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSherry Ertelt / Rebecca Pulick vs Michelle Phenicie / Cyndy Besselievre1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Geist / Kate Becker vs Claire Ehrlich / Victoria Barstow3-6, 4-6
2022-05-13vs CR NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherry Ertelt / Jill Geist vs Debra Faricy / Deborah Jones1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTherese Paranka / Kate Becker vs Jennifer Liebowitz / Julie Chan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Jochens / Rebecca Pulick vs Sarah Marr / Catherine Dunbar3-6, 4-6
2022-05-06vs SSLT ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesSherry Ertelt / Therese Paranka vs Michelle Miller / Leslie Hanna2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Griese / Carol Jochens vs Kristen Tourangeau / Leslie Garson-Wright3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Hahn / Rebecca Pulick vs Julie Lang / Clare Morey2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTherese Paranka / Jill Geist vs Katie Harrison / Katie Deline3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Griese / Rebecca Pulick vs Jacquelyn Deyoung-Boyle / Sandra Cranston2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKate Becker / Sherry Ertelt vs Pam Turner / Eileen Finn6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Carol Jochens
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.08
Lori Benson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Jill Geist
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.77
Melissa Griese
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.76
Sherry Ertelt
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Kate Becker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Hahn
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Rebecca Pulick
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Therese Paranka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Jochens + Melissa Griese4646% games+4.6% vs expected
Katherine Hahn + Lori Benson8558% games+0.4% vs expected
Therese Paranka + Jill Geist0834% games+0.1% vs expected
Carol Jochens + Katherine Hahn81051% games−0.1% vs expected
Carol Jochens + Rebecca Pulick3446% games−1.8% vs expected
Lori Benson + Melissa Griese61345% games−5.2% vs expected
Jill Geist + Sherry Ertelt8747% games−7.6% vs expected
Carol Jochens + Lori Benson1443% games−8.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Jochens
80W–89L career · 7 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
Lori Benson
64W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Jill Geist
31W–46L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Melissa Griese
45W–82L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sherry Ertelt
36W–36L career · type S · 7 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Kate Becker
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Hahn
27W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Pulick
21W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Therese Paranka
1W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.