Teams

Bourland

2026 NE Mixed 40&Over · 9.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-24vs BettsLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Foster / Donna Wyse vs Christine Wiegand / Ron Betts6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGabriel Pariacote / Andrea Jensen vs Kendra Vineyard / Noel Hoig3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJerry Brocky / Tami Bourland vs Kim Miksich / Michael Johnson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-17vs NE/Freeman/Thiesen/40&Over9.0XSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGabriel Pariacote / Tami Bourland vs Rick Stempson / Frauke Hachtmann1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGeorge Nelson / Andrea Jensen vs Ozgur Araz / Herita Akamah7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-03vs BettsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Rich / Ezequiel Piccione vs Noel Hoig / Christine Wiegand4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGabriel Pariacote / Katie Fagan vs Kendra Vineyard / Bryan Pregon6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-03-27vs NE/Freeman/Thiesen/40&Over9.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesGabriel Pariacote / Andrea Jensen vs Mike Garcia / Nancy Johnson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEzequiel Piccione / Tami Bourland vs Christopher Freeman / Stacia Thiesen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Saniuk / Katie Fagan vs Ozgur Araz / Frauke Hachtmann6-7, 5-7
2026-03-13vs BettsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Wyse / George Nelson vs Kendra Vineyard / Bryan Pregon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEzequiel Piccione / Lindsay Clayton vs Jessica Tomlinson / Robert Cimino2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJerry Brocky / Jennifer Rich vs Shannon Dombrowski / Michael Johnson3-6, 3-6
2026-03-06vs NE/Freeman/Thiesen/40&Over9.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesTami Bourland / Jake Hoppe vs Herita Akamah / Rick Stempson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Clayton / Gabriel Pariacote vs Christopher Freeman / Julie Obear0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Freeman/Thiesen5111716149
2Betts4211719161
3Bourland0651329194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Jake Hoppe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Andrea Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.02
George Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.97
Gabriel Pariacote
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.81
Ezequiel Piccione
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Katie Fagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Donna Wyse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Jennifer Rich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Tami Bourland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Lindsay Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jerry Brocky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Michael Saniuk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Jensen + George Nelson2339% gamesnot enough data
Ezequiel Piccione + Lindsay Clayton134 matchesnot enough data
Jerry Brocky + Tami Bourland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jake Hoppe
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Andrea Jensen
82W–65L career · 7 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
George Nelson
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Gabriel Pariacote
32W–36L career · 9 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
Ezequiel Piccione
20W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.81
Katie Fagan
39W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.79
Donna Wyse
155W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
Jennifer Rich
82W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.74
Tami Bourland
157W–121L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.67
Lindsay Clayton
54W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jerry Brocky
35W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Saniuk
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.