← Search

Michael Saniuk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Omaha, NE
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 13W–6L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history19 matches
L
2026-03-27 · Bourland · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katie Fagan mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
L
2024-06-12 · NE/Betts/18&Over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Neese
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-05-29 · NE/Betts/18&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Eglseder
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-05-08 · NE/Betts/18&Over4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Neese
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-04-19 · Dombrowski/Veitzer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara McArdle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-03-15 · Dombrowski/Veitzer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara McArdle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-02-11 · NE/Betts/40&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Heydt
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2023-03-17 · NE/Betts/40&OverMXD9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christine Veitzer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2022-07-27 · Betts · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Donna Wyse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2022-06-26 · Betts · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andria Louis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-06-25 · NE/Betts/18&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabriel Pariacote
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-06-11 · NE/Betts/18&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Eglseder
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
70%
7W–3L · 56.6% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams