Teams

Youzhny 8.0

USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 4.10 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings11 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Youzhny 8.013134825304
2One-all, Love-all122281442391
3Baughman/ Wagner113321028339
4Backhanded Compliments95271537355
5Dirty Love86241842358
6A Team With No Name86231944377
7Just 4 Fun68212148376
8Tennis4Fun68182454389
9ETC Smashers410142861419
10Between the Lines212113168447
11Team Frame11383471477

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Pratap Murali
published 4.5
4.05
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
3.91
3.87
Justin Endow
published 4
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.81
Brent Bradburn
published 4
Donna Polk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Jacob Sessions
published 4
3.62
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.59
Brad Hines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Robert Clifford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Koppenhafer + Pratap Murali8169% games+15.8% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Jacob Sessions13262% games+4.2% vs expected
Jacob Sessions + Vanessa Almaraz12354% games+2.5% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Pratap Murali161849% games−3.4% vs expected
Kimberly Clifford + Robert Clifford261650% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Clifford + Brad Hines18658% gamesnot enough data
Brad Hines + Vanessa Almaraz21041% gamesnot enough data
Justin Endow + Donna Polk8261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Pratap Murali
99W–69L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
106W–105L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Leslie Koppenhafer
265W–130L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Justin Endow
167W–107L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Brent Bradburn
136W–99L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Donna Polk
35W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jacob Sessions
109W–73L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–67L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Kimberly Clifford
142W–113L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Brad Hines
36W–38L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Clifford
85W–84L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.