Teams

LTA-Q GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs MEA NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesClaire Schlosser / Julie Benson vs Megan Murray / Shawna Sharp6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSara Campbell vs Ridgley Straka2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLori Preston / Natalie Gilbert vs Susan Lewis / Jennifer Bray6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDena Stark / Julie Fletcher vs Molly Kirk / Jill Lintukorpi2-6, 2-6
2026-07-09vs NJ BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJulie Benson / Claire Schlosser vs Shaun Howe / Carrie Poulsen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarol Schwendener vs Elizabeth Sones2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Maggio / Lori Preston vs Kerry Mobley / Rebecca Strobel6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDena Stark / Megan Hayes vs Leah Vladika / Jennifer Grube3-6, 0-6
2026-07-02vs RCC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Maggio / Julie Benson vs Lisa Highley / Torey Kirkpatrick6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSara Campbell vs Jennifer Schierkolk6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Lutt / Ruth Weinberg vs Crystal Higgins / Cindy Ronlov2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-25vs BTA-C YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Preston / Julie Benson vs Linda Schutter / Salme Ostlund6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRuth Weinberg / Karen Lutt vs Jackye Whalen / Thelma Condon4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCamille Benton / Dena Stark vs Leslie Krug / Xiaoyan Wang6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs MEA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesClaire Schlosser / Lisa Maggio vs Martha Lanaghen / Shawna Sharp6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSara Campbell vs Ridgley Straka2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Benson / Lori Preston vs Teri Jean Fry / Susan Lewis6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRuth Weinberg / Karen Lutt vs Karen Kruse / Molly Kirk6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs TTA BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesNatalie Gilbert / Lisa Maggio vs Casey Ahn-O'Connor / Rossi Javernick6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarol Schwendener vs Stephanie Saunders0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSara Campbell / Camille Benton vs Diana Merritt / Catherine Jankowski2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDena Stark / Julie Fletcher vs Lindsay Madden / Janice Cook7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs NJ BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesCamille Benton / Julie Benson vs Pamela Johnstone / Kerry Mobley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarol Schwendener vs Shaun Howe3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesClaire Schlosser / Lisa Maggio vs Marlene Swartz / Natasha Uecker6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMegan Hayes / Karen Lutt vs Rachel Eng / Leah Vladika1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Julie Benson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.39
Carol Schwendener
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Sara Campbell
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Lori Preston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Natalie Gilbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Lisa Maggio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Camille Benton
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Ruth Weinberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Claire Schlosser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Lutt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Julie Fletcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Dena Stark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Hayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Benson + Camille Benton6169% games+8.1% vs expected
Julie Benson + Claire Schlosser7161% games+7.3% vs expected
Camille Benton + Lori Preston7360% games+5.9% vs expected
Julie Benson + Lori Preston23762% games+3.5% vs expected
Julie Benson + Lisa Maggio13359% games+2.8% vs expected
Lisa Maggio + Claire Schlosser121153% games+2.0% vs expected
Claire Schlosser + Dena Stark101056% games+0.6% vs expected
Lisa Maggio + Lori Preston7357% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Benson
117W–48L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Carol Schwendener
63W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Sara Campbell
33W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Lori Preston
121W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Natalie Gilbert
20W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Maggio
97W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Camille Benton
106W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Ruth Weinberg
35W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Claire Schlosser
79W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Karen Lutt
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Julie Fletcher
50W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Dena Stark
93W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
Megan Hayes
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.