Teams

TTA BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.35 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs NJ BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Brown / Diana Goodreau vs Marlene Swartz / Natasha Uecker6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Jeannette Violette vs Rachel Eng / Rachel Price2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHeather Petryna / Amy Butler vs Jennifer Grube / Pamela Johnstone0-6, 4-6
2026-07-09vs RCC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesLindsay Madden / Katie Brown vs Torey Kirkpatrick / Crystal Higgins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Jennifer Schierkolk7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Petryna / Amy Butler vs Amy Stackhouse / Georgann Lott3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Goodreau / Jeannette Violette vs Cindy Ronlov / Melissa Ronacher7-6, 6-3
2026-07-02vs BTA-C YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesCasey Ahn-O'Connor / Jeannette Violette vs Salme Ostlund / Ashley Fields0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Xiaoyan Wang5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Brown / Amy Butler vs Leslie Krug / Thelma Condon4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Madden / Janice Cook vs Mary Tran / Linda Schutter2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25vs MEA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeannette Violette / Rossi Javernick vs Martha Lanaghen / Heather Ringoen4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Madden vs Michaele Hinojosa7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Diana Goodreau vs Jinfang Li / Jennifer Bray1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Petryna / Katie Brown vs Ridgley Straka / Teri Jean Fry6-4, 6-2
2026-06-11vs NJ BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Casey Ahn-O'Connor vs Kerry Mobley / Pamela Johnstone4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Elizabeth Sones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLindsay Madden / Katie Brown vs Natasha Uecker / Shaun Howe4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Cook / Amy Butler vs Leah Vladika / Rachel Eng2-6, 3-6
2026-06-11vs LTA-Q GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesCasey Ahn-O'Connor / Rossi Javernick vs Natalie Gilbert / Lisa Maggio2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Saunders vs Carol Schwendener6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Merritt / Catherine Jankowski vs Sara Campbell / Camille Benton6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLindsay Madden / Janice Cook vs Dena Stark / Julie Fletcher6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-04vs RCC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Diana Goodreau vs Torey Kirkpatrick / Lisa Highley7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsay Madden vs Christine Nelson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Petryna / Jeannette Violette vs Crystal Higgins / Christina Kirkpatrick1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Cook / Amy Butler vs Krista Rockeman / Anne Elliott0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Casey Ahn-O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Rossi Javernick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Diana Merritt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Stephanie Saunders
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Diana Goodreau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Lindsay Madden
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Butler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Jeannette Violette
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Catherine Jankowski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Heather Petryna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Janice Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Jankowski + Rossi Javernick13756% games+6.9% vs expected
Janice Cook + Lindsay Madden11652% games+0.4% vs expected
Heather Petryna + Amy Butler11038% games−5.6% vs expected
Janice Cook + Casey Ahn-O'Connor4156% gamesnot enough data
Rossi Javernick + Casey Ahn-O'Connor5071% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Jankowski + Diana Goodreau134 matchesnot enough data
Janice Cook + Jeannette Violette213 matchesnot enough data
Janice Cook + Amy Butler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Ahn-O'Connor
45W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Rossi Javernick
77W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Diana Merritt
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Stephanie Saunders
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Diana Goodreau
13W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Lindsay Madden
62W–73L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy Butler
6W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jeannette Violette
21W–35L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Catherine Jankowski
53W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Heather Petryna
28W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Janice Cook
69W–91L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.