Teams

CSU GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs LVTA NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Powers / Brittney Stephenson vs Meredith Lorick / Karen Pielin6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErin Dirvonas / Falguni Gill vs Amy Black / Hilary Gaylord4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-09-02vs TAG WHITEWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrittney Stephenson / Alison Earnhart vs Arwen Christian / Lisa Novacek6-4, 6-4
2023-08-21vs LVTA ORANGESplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlison Earnhart vs Lusan DellaGrotte6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Dirvonas / Miyuki Chovanetz vs Lesa Morrill-Hughes / Jaclin Elkins6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-14vs CSU GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesFalguni Gill / Laura Powers vs Kim Jensen / Konnie Kosek6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBrittney Stephenson / Tracy Hutton vs Barbara Balok / Rachel White4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-07vs FCCC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrittney Stephenson / Alison Earnhart vs Jen Guernsey / Kelsey Nosler6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFalguni Gill / Monica Bice vs Tahni Clay / Kaylyn Shelby6-1, 6-3
2023-08-02vs HMTC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFalguni Gill / Monica Bice vs Julie Ignowski / Teresa Adsit6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErin Dirvonas / Tracy Hutton vs Diane Carow / Wendy Ball3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-24vs HMTC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Powers / Falguni Gill vs Kathi Freemann / Michele MacHado6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJill Brooks / Brittney Stephenson vs Amy Bona / Kalyn Wegher6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LVTA ORANGE227512111
2CSU GREEN225716129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jill Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Alison Earnhart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.74
Brittney Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.36
Tracy Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Paige Kanatous
published
3.24
Falguni Gill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Erin Dirvonas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Miyuki Chovanetz
published
Monica Bice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Earnhart + Brittney Stephenson22758% games+11.1% vs expected
Monica Bice + Jill Brooks8067% games+5.5% vs expected
Falguni Gill + Jill Brooks13456% games+0.8% vs expected
Erin Dirvonas + Tracy Hutton5159% gamesnot enough data
Erin Dirvonas + Brittney Stephenson4159% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Hutton + Brittney Stephenson5064% gamesnot enough data
Miyuki Chovanetz + Alison Earnhart404 matchesnot enough data
Miyuki Chovanetz + Erin Dirvonas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Brooks
79W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Alison Earnhart
82W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Brittney Stephenson
74W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Tracy Hutton
71W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
Paige Kanatous
37W–32L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Falguni Gill
77W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Erin Dirvonas
114W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Miyuki Chovanetz
21W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica Bice
30W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.