Teams

LVTA NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Karen Pielin vs Laura Powers / Brittney Stephenson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJosephine Bikos vs Paige Kanatous4-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs LVTA ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Abrahamson / Heather Huntley vs Austin Johnson / Lesa Morrill-Hughes6-2, 6-0
2023-08-21vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Abrahamson / Heather Huntley vs Kim Jensen / Konnie Kosek6-1, 6-2
2023-08-14vs FCCC PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Abrahamson / Heather Huntley vs Kelli Barber / Haley Hasler2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Aileen VanMeveren6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Pielin / Melissa King vs Karen Preiss / Stephanie Kemp0-6, 3-6
2023-08-07vs HMTC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Karen Pielin vs Kathleen Vandenberg / Kalyn Wegher6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJosephine Bikos vs Amy Bona3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-31vs TAG WHITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Huntley / Heidi Abrahamson vs Janice Mossberg / Sharon Sturges6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Christy Mascarenas6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHilary Gaylord / Josephine Bikos vs Marcia Stauter / Arwen Christian3-6, 0-6
2023-07-24vs HMTC SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Karen Pielin vs Wendy Ball / Maria Ellis6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJosephine Bikos / Amy Black vs Julie Ignowski / Cimarron Spitz7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Meredith Lorick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.44
Heather Huntley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Heidi Abrahamson
published
3.20
Josephine Bikos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Hilary Gaylord
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Abrahamson + Heather Huntley22860% games+3.0% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Meredith Lorick8167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meredith Lorick
101W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
3.5
Heather Huntley
68W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Heidi Abrahamson
32W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.25
3.5
Josephine Bikos
37W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Hilary Gaylord
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.