Teams

GSTL40/Smith/Prestwick

2025 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult Women - 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-09vs GSTL40/Watts/RLTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatalie Rogers / Shital Patel vs Lorna Stribos / Amanda Drosieko5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Boullion / Stacy Hughes vs Marie Taylor / Laura Oljeski1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Quinney / Christen Dileonardo vs Amy Springs / Catherine Hill6-3, 6-3
2025-10-04vs GSTL40/Watts/RLTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Coker / Sarah LaPerle vs Marie Taylor / Laura Oljeski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Wallace / Cynthia Moran vs Denise Watts / Jolynn Prochaska0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Baker / Patti Conrad vs Lorna Stribos / Amanda Drosieko6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-09-05vs GSTL40/Watts/RLTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Quinney / Stacy Hughes vs Holly Cox / Camilla Parker7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Rogers / Linda Tangeman vs Marie Taylor / Laura Oljeski4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Coker / Sarah LaPerle vs Jolynn Prochaska / Catherine Hill3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-03vs GSTL40/Watts/RLTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatherine Quinney / Rene Smith vs Lorna Stribos / Jolynn Prochaska2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Rogers / Heather Johnson vs Debbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Boullion / Shital Patel vs Holly Cox / Amy Springs6-4, 6-2
2025-08-27vs GSTL40/Watts/RLTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKerry Schwanz / Christen Dileonardo vs Holly Cox / Amy Springs3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Wallace / Shital Patel vs Marie Taylor / Laura Oljeski6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Boullion / Rene Smith vs Debbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Christen Dileonardo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Natalie Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Katherine Quinney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Lindsay Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Stacy Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Shital Patel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Cynthia Moran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Kerry Schwanz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Sandy Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Michael Coker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Patti Conrad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Sarah LaPerle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Rene Smith
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Linda Tangeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Boullion
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Schwanz + Michael Coker3353% games+2.9% vs expected
Rene Smith + Christen Dileonardo5448% games−8.0% vs expected
Sarah LaPerle + Michael Coker3350% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Quinney + Natalie Rogers2345% gamesnot enough data
Shital Patel + Natalie Rogers1444% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Quinney + Shital Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Rene Smith + Stacy Hughes224 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Hughes + Michael Coker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christen Dileonardo
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Natalie Rogers
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.69
Katherine Quinney
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Lindsay Wallace
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Stacy Hughes
39W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Shital Patel
17W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
4
Cynthia Moran
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Kerry Schwanz
20W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Sandy Baker
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
Michael Coker
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Patti Conrad
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
Sarah LaPerle
28W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Rene Smith
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Linda Tangeman
11W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kristin Boullion
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.