Teams

GSTL40/Watts/RLTC

2025 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult Women - 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-09vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickLost 12
W#1 DoublesLorna Stribos / Amanda Drosieko vs Natalie Rogers / Shital Patel7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Kristin Boullion / Stacy Hughes6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Springs / Catherine Hill vs Katherine Quinney / Christen Dileonardo3-6, 3-6
2025-10-04vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Michael Coker / Sarah LaPerle6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDenise Watts / Jolynn Prochaska vs Lindsay Wallace / Cynthia Moran6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLorna Stribos / Amanda Drosieko vs Sandy Baker / Patti Conrad4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-05vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickLost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Cox / Camilla Parker vs Katherine Quinney / Stacy Hughes6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Natalie Rogers / Linda Tangeman6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJolynn Prochaska / Catherine Hill vs Michael Coker / Sarah LaPerle6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-03vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickLost 12
W#1 DoublesLorna Stribos / Jolynn Prochaska vs Katherine Quinney / Rene Smith6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund vs Natalie Rogers / Heather Johnson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Cox / Amy Springs vs Kristin Boullion / Shital Patel4-6, 2-6
2025-08-27vs GSTL40/Smith/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Cox / Amy Springs vs Kerry Schwanz / Christen Dileonardo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Lindsay Wallace / Shital Patel4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund vs Kristin Boullion / Rene Smith6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Lorna Stribos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Marie Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Catherine Hill
published 4
3.67
Laura Oljeski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Amanda Drosieko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Camilla Parker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Jolynn Prochaska
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Denise Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Amy Springs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Holly Cox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kathryn Vanderford
published
Kelle Siegmund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorna Stribos + Holly Cox5163% games+11.5% vs expected
Marie Taylor + Laura Oljeski6556% games−4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorna Stribos
16W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
Marie Taylor
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.80
4
Catherine Hill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Oljeski
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Amanda Drosieko
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Camilla Parker
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jolynn Prochaska
30W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
4
Denise Watts
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Amy Springs
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Holly Cox
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Vanderford
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelle Siegmund
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.