Teams

Wilson - RS Hard

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-10vs Koontz - PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Arron Cravatt / Trish Kington6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-02vs Ross - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Bell / Denise Wilson vs Bonnie Bucco / Nikki Bucco3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-09-24vs Escambia/Tan/TriLevel4.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesIngrid Corbett / Karen Penn vs Sophie Rudman / MacEy Hicks7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-19vs Etscheid - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeannette Fabbro / Ingrid Corbett vs Peggy van Sleen / Sissy Ford6-2, 7-6
2024-09-12vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesIngrid Corbett / Emily Young vs Cherie Tan / Tonya Pfeifle0-6, 2-6
2024-09-05vs Essex - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Carol Essex / Stephanie Taunton6-4, 6-2
2024-08-22vs Koontz - PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Jennifer McCurdy / Susan Clark6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Jeannette Fabbro
published
3.20
Denise Wilson
published 3.5
3.20
Ingrid Corbett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
2.84
Jill Wilson
published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
published
Alita Fisher
published 3
2.75
Jill Sparks
published
2.57
Tanya Young
published
2.57
Susan Schellin
published
Emily Ioakim
published
Kiley Leonard
published
Savannah Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Sparks + Jacqueline Pommerening224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Schellin + Tanya Young303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Jeannette Fabbro
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Denise Wilson
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Ingrid Corbett
67W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Jacqueline Pommerening
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jill Wilson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alita Fisher
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Sparks
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Tanya Young
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%31%69%
2.57
Susan Schellin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
Emily Ioakim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kiley Leonard
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savannah Wilson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.