Teams

Tan - SHL

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-10vs Essex - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Jessica Gonterman vs Carol Essex / Dana Persons6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-03vs Koontz - PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Gonterman / Tonya Pfeifle vs Megan Zimmerman / Jennifer McCurdy6-2, 6-3
2024-09-19vs Koontz - PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / MacEy Hicks vs Trish Kington / Jennifer McCurdy7-6, 6-2
2024-09-12vs Wilson - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Tonya Pfeifle vs Ingrid Corbett / Emily Young6-0, 6-2
2024-09-05vs Ross - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Tonya Pfeifle vs Bonnie Bucco / Thuy Nguyen6-2, 6-2
2024-08-29vs Etscheid - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Maria Hicks vs Peggy van Sleen / Marcy Thompson6-2, 6-4
2024-08-22vs Essex - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Maria Hicks vs Kelly Dantino / Carolyn Bosworth7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Tonya Pfeifle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.28
Aivel Dadisman
published 3.5
3.04
Cara Tenpenny
published 3
2.98
Haley Papajohn
published
Ashley Crossland
published 3
Darcy Meredeth
published 3
2.48
Annie Malone
published 3
Jessica Gonterman
published
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Tonya Pfeifle404 matchesnot enough data
Haley Papajohn + Cara Tenpenny213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tonya Pfeifle
154W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Aivel Dadisman
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Cara Tenpenny
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
Haley Papajohn
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Ashley Crossland
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Darcy Meredeth
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Annie Malone
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.48
Jessica Gonterman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.