Teams

Tampa Palms 7.0 Mixed - R .Helme

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-17vs Hills/B. HartLost 01
L#3 DoublesTu Phan / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Michael Gauthier / Tiffany Garner2-6, 1-6
2022-07-15vs Cheval Aces and Sevens - L. HannaWon 10
W#3 DoublesEnrique Escobar / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Kalicharan Durgampudi / Terry Wilson6-1, 6-1
2022-07-03vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Miller / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Brian Maltass / Alecia Collins6-3, 6-3
2022-06-05vs Buckhorn - J. TorresWon 20
W#1 DoublesTu Phan / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Joe Izzo / Krissy Heybroek6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Wenhong Li vs Javid Lateef / Dang Williamson6-3, 6-0
2022-05-15vs Cheval Aces and Sevens - L. HannaLost 01
L#2 DoublesTu Phan / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Esteban Carrascal / Melissa Chevalier4-6, 6-7
2022-05-01vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesWenhong Li / Michael Dasilva vs Julie Sakre / Matthew Warren7-6, 6-3
2022-04-24vs FH Fireworks - J. MedinaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Dasilva / Wenhong Li vs Edward Colihan / Norma Solters6-2, 6-3
2022-04-10vs Hills/B. HartWon 10
W#2 DoublesTu Phan / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Darin Garner / Jody McNamee4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Richard Helme
published
3.62
Tu Phan
published
3.48
Fan Wang
published 3.5
3.40
Wenhong Li
published 3.5
3.35
Doug Angelone
published 3.5
3.19
Ian Zhang
published 3.5
3.07
Xue Chan
published
3.00
Wei Xue
published
2.92
Elizabeth Dasilva
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Monica Castaneda
published
Michael Dasilva
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
QuynhTran Tonnu
published
Robert Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Dasilva + Michael Dasilva8264% gamesnot enough data
Ian Zhang + Fan Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Helme
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.72
Tu Phan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Fan Wang
32W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Wenhong Li
116W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Doug Angelone
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Ian Zhang
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Xue Chan
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Wei Xue
22W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Monica Castaneda
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
Michael Dasilva
81W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
QuynhTran Tonnu
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Miller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.