Teams

Sequoyah/Jennifer Martin

2025 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Christmas Tourn · 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-08vs Sequoyah/Debi WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Cargle / Lindsey Langhans vs Shelly Bell / Olivia Williams2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCalli Davis / Ashley Venkatesu vs Regina Hicks / Marsha Thompson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKailey Beth Treglown / Ronna Sabino vs Carol Martinez / Chelsey Ogles6-1, 6-2
2024-12-08vs SuskindWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Cargle / Allison Harrison vs Shirley Rutledge / Michelle Gambill6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJill Robinson / Calli Davis vs Tina Jones / Tonya Siniard7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMillie Morgan / Haleigh Allario vs Tina Waggoner / Heather Vess6-2, 6-2
2024-12-07vs SuskindWon 20
W#2 DoublesCalli Davis / Hannah Laury vs Tina Jones / Chris Tarpley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKailey Beth Treglown / Haleigh Allario vs Tina Waggoner / Lisa Goble6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Allison Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.73
Calli Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Lindsey Langhans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Jill Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Millie Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Haleigh Allario
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Ronna Sabino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kailey Beth Treglown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Hannah Laury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Ashley Venkatesu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Millie Morgan + Ronna Sabino14760% games+10.7% vs expected
Calli Davis + Hannah Laury404 matchesnot enough data
Haleigh Allario + Kailey Beth Treglown314 matchesnot enough data
Haleigh Allario + Millie Morgan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Harrison
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Calli Davis
46W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lindsey Langhans
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jill Robinson
32W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Millie Morgan
65W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.12
Haleigh Allario
29W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Ronna Sabino
61W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Kailey Beth Treglown
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Hannah Laury
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3.5
Ashley Venkatesu
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.