Teams

Sequoyah/Debi Williams

2025 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Christmas Tourn · 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-08vs SuskindWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Mendi Holsomback vs Tonya Siniard / Sabrina Wilson6-1, 7-5
2024-12-08vs Sequoyah/Jennifer MartinLost 12
W#1 DoublesShelly Bell / Olivia Williams vs Sarah Cargle / Lindsey Langhans6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRegina Hicks / Marsha Thompson vs Calli Davis / Ashley Venkatesu3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Martinez / Chelsey Ogles vs Kailey Beth Treglown / Ronna Sabino1-6, 2-6
2024-12-07vs SuskindWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Regina Hicks vs Chris Tarpley / Sabrina Wilson6-4, 6-4
2024-12-07vs Sequoyah/Jennifer MartinLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Mendi Holsomback vs Hannah Laury / Ashley Venkatesu3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Olivia Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Charlie Lewis
published 3.5
3.27
Nancy Carr
published
3.16
Regina Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Marsha Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Chelsey Ogles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Carol Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Abbigail Henry
published 3
2.78
Debi Williams
published 3
2.67
Mendi Holsomback
published
2.56
Ann Carroll
published 3
Margie DeShon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Thompson + Regina Hicks314 matchesnot enough data
Chelsey Ogles + Carol Martinez224 matchesnot enough data
Carol Martinez + Debi Williams134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Williams
29W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Charlie Lewis
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Nancy Carr
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Regina Hicks
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Marsha Thompson
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Chelsey Ogles
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Carol Martinez
35W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Abbigail Henry
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Debi Williams
22W–31L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Mendi Holsomback
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.67
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.