Teams

Tuplano/Ostlund TBC 3.5 Winter 2025

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-10vs ORCC- BenowitzWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Ruble / Alejandro Trevino vs Joshua Draves-Kellerman / Fred Rappaport6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Zachary Robins6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJin Chang / Lawrence Wong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJin Chang / Matthew Ruble vs Matthew Fling / Benjamin Canine6-4, 6-0
2025-02-24vs Christiansen: Non-PickleballersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Justin Miller6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrei Kittelson / William Schiller vs Chris Semler / Brian Dahlin1-6, 3-6
2025-02-17vs Northern/Fermstad/18&Over3.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJin Chang / William Schiller vs Kaeden Erickson / Loren Provenzano1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Ryan Albu6-1, 6-0
2025-02-10vs Bogen Winter 25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Andrew Womeldorf3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-03vs ORCC- BenowitzWon 21
W#1 DoublesJin Chang / Matthew Ruble vs Alex Gustafson / Fred Rappaport6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Zachary Robins6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Lawrence Wong vs Luke Anderson / Joe Petersen3-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesWilliam Schiller / Jin Chang vs John Smetana / Bradley Stageberg6-3, 6-4
2025-01-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Chris Semler1-6, 4-6
2025-01-13vs Northern/Fermstad/18&Over3.5MWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Carlson vs Richard Dillman6-4, 7-6
2025-01-06vs Bogen Winter 25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Rasmussen / William Schiller vs Bin Huang / Alexander Tang6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Brett Carlson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.60
Ryan Baisch
published
3.60
Bradford Richter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Per Ostlund
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Andrei Kittelson
published 3.5
3.48
William Schiller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Austin Choe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Cristian Bancos
published 3.5
3.44
Wilfert Long
published
3.38
Matthew Ruble
published
3.35
Sam Auyoung
published
3.29
Jin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Jov Tuplano
published
3.23
David Rasmussen
published 3.5
3.17
Alejandro Trevino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Lawrence Wong
published
3.08
Gene Scow
published
3.07
Tim Theobald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Wong + Gene Scow5650% games+5.5% vs expected
William Schiller + Matthew Ruble7852% games+2.0% vs expected
William Schiller + Jin Chang101047% games+0.4% vs expected
Jin Chang + Alejandro Trevino2443% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Wong + Tim Theobald044 matchesnot enough data
David Rasmussen + Jin Chang303 matchesnot enough data
David Rasmussen + Andrei Kittelson303 matchesnot enough data
Jov Tuplano + Ryan Baisch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Carlson
84W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.63
Ryan Baisch
63W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Bradford Richter
29W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Andrei Kittelson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
William Schiller
87W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Austin Choe
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Cristian Bancos
29W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Wilfert Long
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Matthew Ruble
42W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sam Auyoung
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Jin Chang
134W–139L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jov Tuplano
24W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
David Rasmussen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Lawrence Wong
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Gene Scow
16W–34L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tim Theobald
40W–41L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.