Teams

Talis Park / Maatallah

2025 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Winter · Mixed 40 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-08vs Longshore Lake / BarnardLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hurt-Simmons / Dave Carlquist vs SUE BECK / Jordan Rieks6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesDave Carlquist / Barbara Hurt-Simmons vs Connie Johnson / Chris Brewer7-5, 7-6
2025-02-15vs Longshore Lake / BarnardLost 01
L#3 DoublesDave Carlquist / Andrea Maatallah vs Rick Barnard / SUE BECK5-7, 5-7
2025-02-01vs Riverstone / DiDonatoWon 10
W#2 DoublesDave Carlquist / Andrea Maatallah vs Colin Estrem / Audra DiDonato6-2, 6-3
2025-01-25vs Saturnia Lakes / FischelLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Maatallah / Dave Carlquist vs Laura Haney / Erwin Gumapac1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bethe Halpern
published 4
3.60
Dean Cook
published 4
3.39
CHRISTOPHER HEIM
published 3.5
3.34
Dave Carlquist
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
3.30
Dawn DeDomenico
published 3.5
3.25
Andrea Maatallah
published 3.5
3.19
Ellen Evans
published
Evan Lukasik
published
Megan Curran
published
Patricia Buonaiuto
published
Steve Buonaiuto
published
Thomas Weisel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Lukasik + Andrea Maatallah224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Curran + Dave Carlquist213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bethe Halpern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dean Cook
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
CHRISTOPHER HEIM
6W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dave Carlquist
75W–71L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Barbara Hurt-Simmons
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dawn DeDomenico
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Maatallah
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Ellen Evans
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Evan Lukasik
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Curran
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Buonaiuto
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Buonaiuto
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Weisel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.