Teams

Saturnia Lakes / Fischel

2025 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Winter · Mixed 40 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-01vs Longshore Lake / BarnardLost 01
L#2 DoublesErwin Gumapac / Laura Haney vs Doug Clough / Margaret Laggis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Cambier / ConroyWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Collins Pennie vs Joe Kentfield / Janette Logan6-3, 6-2
2025-02-15vs Riverstone / DiDonatoWon 10
W#2 DoublesErwin Gumapac / Laura Haney vs Michael Elliott / Audra DiDonato6-1, 7-6
2025-01-25vs Talis Park / MaatallahWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Erwin Gumapac vs Andrea Maatallah / Dave Carlquist6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-11vs Longshore Lake / BarnardLost 01
L#2 DoublesGian Fidanli / Laura Haney vs Rick Barnard / Margaret Laggis3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Anita Susco
published 4
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Erwin Gumapac
published 3.5
2.79
Gian Fidanli
published 3
2.73
Irene Nirmaier
published 3
2.61
Sherry Sheldon
published
2.50
Ira Olivos
published 3
Kristie Kederis
published
Linda Lucombe
published
Roman Veksler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Susco + Gian Fidanli10262% games+16.7% vs expected
Ira Olivos + Erwin Gumapac1531% gamesnot enough data
Linda Lucombe + Erwin Gumapac033 matchesnot enough data
Roman Veksler + Irene Nirmaier123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anita Susco
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Erwin Gumapac
2W–13L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Gian Fidanli
10W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Irene Nirmaier
1W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Sherry Sheldon
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Ira Olivos
1W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kristie Kederis
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Lucombe
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Roman Veksler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.