Teams

Tough Love/Larionova/Walnut Creek

2025 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesStephanie Alexander / Stephanie Areen vs Yui Tantiyavarong / Anusha Arcalgud6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSeena Shanker / Alexandra Gunnell vs Samantha Herman / Tegwyn John6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesValerie Pietrasz / Janell Mollenhauer vs Arden Lee / Manasa Gadde7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesStephanie Areen / Stephanie Alexander vs Rina Matsumoto / Sabrina Thong6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSeena Shanker / Alexandra Gunnell vs Clarissa Binkley / Sara Schipani3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesValerie Pietrasz / Yuen Chiang vs Emily Huang / Rachel Gabato6-4, 7-6
2025-03-21vs Good Vibes/Kim/MoragaWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Alexander / Stephanie Areen vs Chandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLena Larionova / Cristina Tudor vs Jessica Kim / Katy Keim6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Himenez / Valerie Pietrasz vs Maribel Barajas / Angela Merola6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Stephanie Areen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.48
Cristina Tudor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.35
Stephanie Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Seena Shanker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Lena Larionova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Alexandra Gunnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Valerie Pietrasz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Yuen Chiang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Janell Mollenhauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Donna Himenez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Alexander + Stephanie Areen4257% games+1.9% vs expected
Stephanie Alexander + Cristina Tudor404 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Gunnell + Seena Shanker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Areen
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.55
5
Cristina Tudor
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
Stephanie Alexander
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Seena Shanker
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Lena Larionova
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Alexandra Gunnell
29W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Yuen Chiang
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Janell Mollenhauer
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Donna Himenez
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.