Teams

Good Vibes/Kim/Moraga

2025 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesNoa Ramo-Larios / Chandra Thomas vs Isa Chau / Megan Tang3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJamille Lee / Jessica Kim vs Clarissa Fung / Daniela Castillo Contreras0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaribel Barajas / Angela Merola vs Adeeti Ullal / Kristen Wong3-6, 0-6
2025-03-22vs SunnyWhale/Jin/SunnyvaleWon 21
L#1 DoublesChandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios vs Danielle Caro / Aoife Wilson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJamille Lee / Mai Angsupanich vs Jennifer Jin / Winnie Zhang7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Frederick / Lauren Dutton vs Jiyun Hong / Joany Gao6-4, 6-1
2025-03-21vs Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Walnut CreekWon 21
W#1 DoublesChandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios vs Marianne Dundon / Signy Judd6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMai Angsupanich / Katy Keim vs Nicole Stephens / Jill Van Slyke6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrooke Frederick / Lauren Dutton vs Ana Larner / Bowyee Gong6-7, 5-7
2025-03-21vs Tough Love/Larionova/Walnut CreekLost 12
L#1 DoublesChandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios vs Stephanie Alexander / Stephanie Areen5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Kim / Katy Keim vs Lena Larionova / Cristina Tudor7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaribel Barajas / Angela Merola vs Donna Himenez / Valerie Pietrasz6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Noa Ramo-Larios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Chandra Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Jessica Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Jamille Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Katy Keim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Brooke Frederick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Maribel Barajas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Angela Merola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Mai Angsupanich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Dutton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Kim + Chandra Thomas6357% games+5.0% vs expected
Chandra Thomas + Noa Ramo-Larios3346% games+3.8% vs expected
Jessica Kim + Angela Merola213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Chandra Thomas
27W–14L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Jessica Kim
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
Jamille Lee
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Katy Keim
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Brooke Frederick
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Maribel Barajas
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Angela Merola
46W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Mai Angsupanich
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
Lauren Dutton
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.