Teams

Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Walnut Creek

2025 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesSigny Judd / Marianne Dundon vs Tegwyn John / Elani Phan3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Stephens / Fenny Widjaja vs Samantha Herman / Jenny Wang7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBowyee Gong / Mika Tsuchiiwa vs Arden Lee / Catherine Puzon4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMarianne Dundon / Signy Judd vs Nora Engelmann / Leslie Chan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFenny Widjaja / Nicole Stephens vs Liza Geary / Elaine Smith6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMika Tsuchiiwa / Martha Matrisian vs Alicia Li / Shelli Skinner2-6, 6-7
2025-03-21vs Good Vibes/Kim/MoragaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarianne Dundon / Signy Judd vs Chandra Thomas / Noa Ramo-Larios3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Stephens / Jill Van Slyke vs Mai Angsupanich / Katy Keim2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAna Larner / Bowyee Gong vs Brooke Frederick / Lauren Dutton7-6, 7-5
L#1 DoublesMarianne Dundon / Signy Judd vs Katharine Dicconson / Megan Tang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFenny Widjaja / Jill Van Slyke vs Daniela Castillo Contreras / Lisa Liang0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Matrisian / Ana Larner vs Kristen Wong / Adeeti Ullal4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Marianne Dundon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Signy Judd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Martha Matrisian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Fenny Widjaja
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Nicole Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Ana Larner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Mika Tsuchiiwa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Vanessa Garcia
published
3.73
Bowyee Gong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
DANITA ALLEN
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Stephens + Fenny Widjaja2353% games+3.8% vs expected
Marianne Dundon + Signy Judd0535% games−16.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marianne Dundon
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
4.39
Signy Judd
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
4.34
Martha Matrisian
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Fenny Widjaja
22W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Nicole Stephens
29W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Ana Larner
42W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
Mika Tsuchiiwa
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.83
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
Vanessa Garcia
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bowyee Gong
41W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
DANITA ALLEN
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.