Teams

USTA Atlanta/Mary Kat Smith

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

15 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-08vs Atlanta CC (Molly Baer)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Carter / Katherine Kratz vs Amy Pike / Kelli Patterson7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMary Kat Smith vs Lorna Sergan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Cox / Allison Walker vs Molly Baer / Laura Hoffman3-6, 4-6
2025-12-11vs Windy Hill AC (Casy Walters)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesNicole Carter / Emily Lyn-sue vs Kristin Gouhl / Casy Walters6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKatherine Kratz vs Alexandrea Judge6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsay Padgett / Rachel Mekas vs Katy Stout / Amanda Sinclair6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLara Moberg / Allison Walker vs Lisa Gardner / Hyanga Choe6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRachel Mekas vs Cha Lim7-5, 3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Lyn-sue / Adair Rossi vs Jacqueline Johnson / Eun-ji Park6-2, 7-6
2025-11-20vs Atlanta CC (Molly Baer)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Carter / Katherine Kratz vs Kelli Patterson / Amy Pike4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKathryn Alford vs Lorna Sergan5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Padgett / Annslee Vess vs Elizabeth Pola / Polly Hogue7-6, 6-4
2025-11-13vs Windy Hill AC (Casy Walters)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Kratz / Nicole Carter vs Kristin Gouhl / Casy Walters6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLara Moberg vs Alexandrea Judge1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Kat Smith / Madison Johnson vs Olena Chandran / Katy Stout6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAshley Cox / Lara Moberg vs Lisa Gardner / Cha Lim7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnnslee Vess vs Hyanga Choe6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathryn Alford / Lindsay Padgett vs Jacqueline Johnson / Soojin Ro6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Polo Club (Kristin Garcia)*60162594
2USTA Atlanta/Mary Kat Smith5113510126
3Brookfield CC (Jamie Michel)*5112616159
4Atlanta AC (Teresa Oleary)*5216512133
5Morningview (Jenny Noh)*5213816151
6CC of Roswell (Megan Larkins)*52111021190
7Druid Hills (Jamie Taylor)*4211717169
8Horseshoe Bend (Dawn Mannix)*3310818157
9Neely Farm (Becky Lamont)*339918144
10River Club (Suzanne Lim)*34101123183
11Vickery (Ilana Roth)*2471122172
12Plantation & Preserve (Jessica Bae)*2561532244
13Windy Hill AC (Casy Walters)*1571122170
14Polo Golf & CC (Gianna Whisler-Amneteg)*1541428191
15Brookstone I (Jacqueline Johnson)*1531531207
16Rivermoore Park (Jennifer Brozowski)*1661532230
17Blue Valley (Amber Bahl)*0631530208
18Standard Club (Kellie Lindsey)*0761530203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Annslee Vess
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Allison Walker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Katherine Kratz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.39
Mary Kat Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Nicole Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Lara Moberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.32
Kathryn Alford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.32
Lindsay Padgett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Emily Lyn-sue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Adair Rossi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Heather Goerlich
published 2.5
2.18
Ashley Cox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Rachel Mekas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.07
Madison Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Neda Hanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Kratz + Nicole Carter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annslee Vess
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Allison Walker
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Katherine Kratz
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Mary Kat Smith
11W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Nicole Carter
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
Lara Moberg
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
Kathryn Alford
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Lindsay Padgett
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Emily Lyn-sue
2W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Adair Rossi
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Heather Goerlich
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Cox
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Rachel Mekas
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Madison Johnson
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Neda Hanson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.