Teams

Vickery (Ilana Roth)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-08vs Polo Club (Kristin Garcia)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristina Bailey / Maria Goroso vs Dawn Brookes / Blanka McNatt2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGiselle Allphin / Maureen Weeks vs Holly Easterby / Ansley Willis2-6, 6-7
2025-12-11vs White Columns (Allie Collier)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristina Bailey / Lynsey Hackett vs Rebecca Carey / Ashley Edmonds5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaureen Weeks / Giselle Allphin vs Stuart Winborne / Lindsey Power1-6, 1-6
2025-12-04vs Blue Valley (Amber Bahl)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesKristina Bailey / Maureen Weeks vs Hetal Patel / Lisa Sugent4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGiselle Allphin / Natalia Motovilova vs Celeste Dinerman / Danette Lopez7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKristina Bailey / Lynsey Hackett vs Gianna Whisler-Amneteg / Shari Gordon6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChasity Casey / Natalia Motovilova vs Ashley Pierce / Anne Franzen6-2, 6-0
2025-11-13vs The Manor (Lauren Silverstein)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalia Motovilova / Maureen Weeks vs Lana Wilson / Stephanie Konkle1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaria Goroso vs Yvonne Nelli6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChasity Casey / Kristina Bailey vs Darlene Donlan / Kate Boscoe2-6, 6-4, 6-4
2025-11-06vs Brookfield CC (Jamie Michel)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Goroso / Kristina Bailey vs Kelsey Dearth / Hillary Walton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaureen Weeks / Natalia Motovilova vs Hannah Stokes / Jamie Michel1-6, 6-3, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Polo Club (Kristin Garcia)*60162594
2USTA Atlanta/Mary Kat Smith5113510126
3Brookfield CC (Jamie Michel)*5112616159
4Atlanta AC (Teresa Oleary)*5216512133
5Morningview (Jenny Noh)*5213816151
6CC of Roswell (Megan Larkins)*52111021190
7Druid Hills (Jamie Taylor)*4211717169
8Horseshoe Bend (Dawn Mannix)*3310818157
9Neely Farm (Becky Lamont)*339918144
10River Club (Suzanne Lim)*34101123183
11Vickery (Ilana Roth)*2471122172
12Plantation & Preserve (Jessica Bae)*2561532244
13Windy Hill AC (Casy Walters)*1571122170
14Polo Golf & CC (Gianna Whisler-Amneteg)*1541428191
15Brookstone I (Jacqueline Johnson)*1531531207
16Rivermoore Park (Jennifer Brozowski)*1661532230
17Blue Valley (Amber Bahl)*0631530208
18Standard Club (Kellie Lindsey)*0761530203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Brooke Billingsley
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.58
Chasity Casey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Lynsey Hackett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.22
Kate Jacobus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Natalia Motovilova
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.19
Maria Goroso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.13
Giselle Allphin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Kristina Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.00
Maureen Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ilana Roth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Billingsley + Kate Jacobus5548% games+0.8% vs expected
Maureen Weeks + Kristina Bailey134 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Billingsley + Lynsey Hackett213 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Weeks + Kate Jacobus033 matchesnot enough data
Kate Jacobus + Chasity Casey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brooke Billingsley
10W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Chasity Casey
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Lynsey Hackett
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Kate Jacobus
9W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Natalia Motovilova
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Maria Goroso
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Giselle Allphin
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Kristina Bailey
4W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Maureen Weeks
2W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Ilana Roth
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.