Teams

CSRC MACLIZ

2024 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs LTFCS KALTANBACHERLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Glaser / Monica MacLiz vs Cindy Yetter / Tatiana Merkoulova4-6, 0-6
2024-04-20vs PBTC MITCHELLWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonica MacLiz / Kristen Lowery vs Emily Vidmar / Paula Henson6-3, 6-3
2024-04-13vs CSRC VANEVERYLost 01
L#1 DoublesOlivia Boudreau / Olivia Salmon vs Jane Corral / Leanne Thompson2-6, 3-6
2024-04-06vs LTFCS KALTANBACHERWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Lowery / Monica MacLiz vs Janae Kite / Jennifer Madden6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracy Glaser / Olivia Salmon vs Tatiana Merkoulova / Salome D'Silva6-3, 6-2
2024-03-30vs PBTC MITCHELLWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Jessica Kepler / Judy Mitchell6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMonica MacLiz vs Anne Dawid6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Shelby Johnson
published
3.86
Nancy Barker
published
3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Monica MacLiz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.63
Olivia Boudreau
published
3.57
Kristen Lowery
published
3.48
Tracy Glaser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Roni Schlagel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barker + Olivia Salmon8453% games−0.3% vs expected
Olivia Boudreau + Kristen Lowery044 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Lowery + Tracy Glaser044 matchesnot enough data
Monica MacLiz + Tracy Glaser123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Glaser + Olivia Salmon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Johnson
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Monica MacLiz
57W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Olivia Boudreau
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Kristen Lowery
7W–29L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Tracy Glaser
48W–61L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Roni Schlagel
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.