Teams

Haskins

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-05vs McCallWon 21
L#1 DoublesEileen Hendrick / Robin Seibert vs Lara Hanks / Jackie Cruse3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTess Casals / Shelley Boehling vs Barbara Pennington / Kendall Welch6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Noto / Kathleen Leone vs Sara Borcherding / Kelly Ochsner6-1, 6-3
2025-04-05vs Coco (Day)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLori Haskins / Jeanne Gillen vs Margaret Coco / Diana Messier7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHilary Cole / Denise Vliet vs Margaret Varga-Roberson / Catherine Infante6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Anderson / Shelley Boehling vs Jennifer Hartnett / Holly Robinson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-31vs McCallWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Seibert / Denise Vliet vs Nancy Holly / Jackie Cruse7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTess Casals / Shelley Boehling vs Kelly Ochsner / Sara Borcherding6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacey Anderson / Eileen Hendrick vs Barbara Pennington / Lara Hanks6-4, 6-1
2025-03-19vs Fania/O'Connell SJWon 30
W#1 DoublesStacey Anderson / Barbara Caropolo vs Karen Fania / Sharon Wesson7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Haskins / Jeanne Gillen vs Peggy O'Connell / Joan Proctor6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHilary Cole / Eileen Hendrick vs Catherine Richard / Kelli Brownfield6-3, 6-4
2025-03-03vs Coco (Day)Won 21
L#1 DoublesTess Casals / Carolyn Noto vs Margaret Varga-Roberson / Debbie Canty2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanne Gillen / Lori Haskins vs Margaret Coco / Kathleen Bradcovich6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRobin Seibert / Denise Vliet vs Holly Robinson / Kathleen Kunze6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Lori Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Beth Davis
published 4
Denise Vliet
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Jeanne Gillen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Barbara Caropolo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Carolyn Noto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Robin Seibert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Eileen Hendrick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Shelley Boehling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Kathleen Leone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Tess Casals
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Haskins + Jeanne Gillen17456% games+0.6% vs expected
Robin Seibert + Eileen Hendrick1447% games−4.4% vs expected
Robin Seibert + Tess Casals1441% gamesnot enough data
Lori Haskins + Tess Casals213 matchesnot enough data
Robin Seibert + Denise Vliet303 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Boehling + Tess Casals213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Haskins
25W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Beth Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Denise Vliet
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Gillen
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Barbara Caropolo
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Carolyn Noto
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Robin Seibert
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Eileen Hendrick
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Shelley Boehling
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.59
Kathleen Leone
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Tess Casals
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.