Teams

McCall

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-05vs HaskinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesLara Hanks / Jackie Cruse vs Eileen Hendrick / Robin Seibert6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara Pennington / Kendall Welch vs Tess Casals / Shelley Boehling3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSara Borcherding / Kelly Ochsner vs Carolyn Noto / Kathleen Leone1-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs FURRLost 12
L#1 DoublesLara Hanks / Nancy Holly vs Jennifer Adams / Margie Shuffler3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKendall Welch / Barbara Pennington vs Candy Garrett / Kim Morris3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSara Borcherding / Kelly Ochsner vs Debbie Trafton / Sandra King6-2, 6-4
2025-04-21vs Coco (Day)Won 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Holly / Jackie Cruse vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Catherine Infante3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSara Borcherding / Catherine McCall vs Margaret Varga-Roberson / Birgitta Jonsson-Seal6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKendall Welch / Barbara Pennington vs Kathleen Hawkins / Diana Messier6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-19vs Fania/O'Connell SJLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Cruse / Nancy Holly vs Karen Fania / Beth OConnor6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLara Hanks / Jean Robbins vs Lori Keipper / Peggy O'Connell3-6, 0-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine McCall / Barbara Pennington vs Kelli Brownfield / Kathleen Murphy4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-31vs HaskinsLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Holly / Jackie Cruse vs Robin Seibert / Denise Vliet5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Ochsner / Sara Borcherding vs Tess Casals / Shelley Boehling3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Pennington / Lara Hanks vs Stacey Anderson / Eileen Hendrick4-6, 1-6
2025-03-24vs GILBERTLost 03
L#1 DoublesOdette Arnold / Lara Hanks vs Jill Watson / Lisa Elsberry0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Pennington / Kendall Welch vs Lisa Gilbert / Liz Coughlin1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJackie Cruse / Mary Holland vs Karen Pennington / Elizabeth Palmer1-6, 2-6
2025-03-19vs FURRLost 12
L#1 DoublesOdette Arnold / Barbara Pennington vs Linda McKinney / Kelly Godfrey1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Ochsner / Sara Borcherding vs Rebecca Durham / Anne Milkes6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Holly / Jean Robbins vs Lori Brinkley / Allison Horton1-6, 4-6
2025-03-15vs Coco (Day)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKendall Welch / Barbara Pennington vs Debbie Canty / Margaret Varga-Roberson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOdette Arnold / Jean Robbins vs Margaret Coco / Kathleen Bradcovich4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSara Borcherding / Mary Holland vs Holly Robinson / Sarah Martin4-6, 2-6
2025-03-03vs Fania/O'Connell SJWon 30
W#1 DoublesOdette Arnold / Lara Hanks vs Beth OConnor / Lori Keipper6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKendall Welch / Kelly Ochsner vs Nancy Wisniewski / Carrie Guerrette6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Cruse / Nancy Holly vs Peggy O'Connell / Kathleen Murphy6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jackie Cruse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine McCall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Lara Hanks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.49
Barbara Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.39
Kelly Ochsner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
Kendall Welch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jean Robbins
published
Nancy Holly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Odette Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sara Borcherding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Pennington + Kendall Welch1437% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Holly + Jackie Cruse134 matchesnot enough data
Sara Borcherding + Kelly Ochsner224 matchesnot enough data
Odette Arnold + Barbara Pennington213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Cruse
37W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Catherine McCall
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lara Hanks
14W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Barbara Pennington
30W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Kelly Ochsner
33W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Kendall Welch
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Jean Robbins
72W–57L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Holly
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Odette Arnold
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Borcherding
14W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.