Teams

STIRLING CLUB

2022 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 2.69 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-12vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 30
W#1 DoublesGuadalupe Sherman / Debra Kelleher vs Irina Tikhonova / Yana Vysotskaya6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLubi Georgieva vs Shirley Thompson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Veazey / Arlene Joyner-Tucker vs Geneva Marcus / Eileen Pico6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-09vs DTC #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLi Chen Chu / Karen Veazey vs Megan Galli / Lisa Schnitz2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGuadalupe Sherman vs Geraldine Davis2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Arlene Joyner-Tucker vs Maria Zoine / Joan Chinn0-6, 1-6
2022-03-02vs CANYON GATEWon 21
W#1 DoublesLi Chen Chu / Debra Kelleher vs Martha Langer / Nadine Kluger6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Lindsey vs Jillian Potashnick6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesArlene Joyner-Tucker / Guadalupe Sherman vs Stacy Sheeley Reyes / Christy Shulman3-6, 2-6
2022-02-16vs SPANISH TRAILLost 12
L#1 DoublesLi Chen Chu / Cerisse Ward vs Francie Angelov / Catherine Fadrowsky2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Lindsey vs Heather Hartzell6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesArlene Joyner-Tucker / Guadalupe Sherman vs Robi Hinton / Julie Brown3-6, 4-6
2022-02-09vs DTC #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Karen Veazey vs Barb Stanley / Julie Ylarde1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDebra Kelleher vs Christa Shiklanian6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGuadalupe Sherman / Cerisse Ward vs Jennifer Mihaloliakos / Debry Weintz3-6, 5-7
2022-02-02vs TPCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Guadalupe Sherman vs Eva Liang / Kimberly Maple6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Alexis Michaud4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStephanie Stephen / Cerisse Ward vs Trish Metriyakool / Susun Michaels2-6, 3-6
2022-01-26vs CLUB RIDGESLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Guadalupe Sherman vs Rose Tucker / Jeannie Sorenson0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Golssa Moridi7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Stephanie Stephen vs Kellye Ray / Char Williams3-6, 0-6
2022-01-21vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSWon 21
W#1 DoublesLubi Georgieva / Emily Lindsey vs Crystal Ziebarth / Jen White6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKaren Veazey vs Daniella Toms7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebra Kelleher / Cerisse Ward vs Shaza Nayef / Jessica Baran2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-01-19vs RED ROCK CCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLi Chen Chu / Karen Veazey vs Brigitte Fallon / Domini Noel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Lindsey vs Darija Velic3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGuadalupe Sherman / Stephanie Stephen vs Heather Gamez / Tracey Lee6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Lindsey
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Karen Veazey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.35
Debra Kelleher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Cerisse Ward
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Guadalupe Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Lubi Georgieva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.76
Arlene Joyner-Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.63
Stephanie Stephen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Stephen + Debra Kelleher1539% games+4.3% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Debra Kelleher71445% games+2.1% vs expected
Guadalupe Sherman + Debra Kelleher4742% games−1.4% vs expected
Guadalupe Sherman + Stephanie Stephen1536% games−3.2% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Lubi Georgieva61342% games−3.9% vs expected
Lubi Georgieva + Debra Kelleher11632% games−4.5% vs expected
Karen Veazey + Guadalupe Sherman3746% games−5.8% vs expected
Cerisse Ward + Debra Kelleher2538% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Lindsey
27W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Karen Veazey
111W–148L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Debra Kelleher
87W–146L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
2.5
Cerisse Ward
6W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Guadalupe Sherman
51W–78L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Lubi Georgieva
37W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Arlene Joyner-Tucker
19W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.76
2.5
Stephanie Stephen
15W–91L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.