Teams

LT WHITE

2026 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-25vs MLF ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Baker / Federico Pardina vs Aaron Phillips / Nicholas Roe7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDavid van Thuyne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Sundstedt / James Morrow vs David Trevino / Joe Ashbee6-4, 6-4
2026-04-18vs FCCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid van Thuyne / Michael Baker vs Mason Bryant / Don Kennedy7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Bikos / Mark Sundstedt vs Gregory Gibbs / Matthew Hoeven1-6, 1-6
2026-04-04vs HMTC BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid van Thuyne / Steve Dale vs Jameel Chohan / Richard Penhale6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDan Bikos / James Morrow vs Sebastian Baumgaertel / Alan Krech6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-04vs MLF SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid van Thuyne / Mark Sundstedt vs Scott Daigle / Gordon Beck2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesFederico Pardina vs Jonathan Koester1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDan Bikos / James Morrow vs Wil Buchanan / Tyler Griffith4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT WHITE226613112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
David van Thuyne
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.80
Steve Dale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
James Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Mark Sundstedt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Federico Pardina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.31
Dan Bikos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Dale + David van Thuyne5058% gamesnot enough data
David van Thuyne + Dan Bikos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David van Thuyne
70W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Steve Dale
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
James Morrow
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Mark Sundstedt
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Federico Pardina
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Dan Bikos
27W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.