Teams

HMTC BLACK

2026 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-28vs MLF SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesSebastian Baumgaertel / Forest Dixon vs Royce Grover / Scott Daigle3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Mayfield vs Jeff Arnett6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Penhale / Alan Krech vs William Freet / Jonathan Koester2-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs MLF ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesJameel Chohan / Richard Penhale vs Aaron Phillips / Nicholas Roe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Mayfield vs Rajesh Gopalakrishnan1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Krech / Forest Dixon vs Phillip Dorion / David Trevino1-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs FCCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Mayfield / Richard Penhale vs Don Kennedy / Tidhar Sadeh7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJameel Chohan vs Joseph Lillis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesForest Dixon / Alan Krech vs Josh Shelby / Gregory Gibbs0-6, 0-6
2026-04-04vs LT WHITEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJameel Chohan / Richard Penhale vs David van Thuyne / Steve Dale1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJohn Mayfield vs Michael Baker7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSebastian Baumgaertel / Alan Krech vs Dan Bikos / James Morrow6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jameel Chohan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.81
Richard Penhale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
John Mayfield
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Alan Krech
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Forest Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Gary Westlind
published 3.5
Sebastian Baumgaertel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Forest Dixon + Alan Krech3344% games−7.4% vs expected
Jameel Chohan + Richard Penhale314 matchesnot enough data
Jameel Chohan + Sebastian Baumgaertel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jameel Chohan
32W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Richard Penhale
99W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
John Mayfield
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alan Krech
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
Forest Dixon
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Gary Westlind
15W–62L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Sebastian Baumgaertel
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.