Teams

SRTC-Garofoli

2023 OH OV SUMMER Mixed 18&O Dayton · 2023 MXD 18&O 7.0 Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 3.64 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-07-21vs FSSC-AndersonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Garofoli / Deborah Pearson vs Robert Hawley / Rachel Hawley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Garofoli / Chetana Wilkins vs Matthew Taylor / Jessica Anderson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 MXD 18&O 7.0 Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Sally Schmidt
published
3.70
Carol Poe
published 4
3.69
Andrew Garofoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Deborah Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Lindsay Bremar
published
David Garofoli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Thomas Chillinsky
published
3.16
James Bremar
published 3.5
3.10
Chetana Wilkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Cecil Mullins
published 3
Kathe Mullins
published
Richard Termuhlen
published
Robin Balmer
published
VIcky Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecil Mullins + Carol Poe6455% games−0.2% vs expected
Kathe Mullins + Cecil Mullins7850% games−0.8% vs expected
James Bremar + Lindsay Bremar121747% games−2.4% vs expected
Cecil Mullins + Sally Schmidt4248% games−5.8% vs expected
Thomas Chillinsky + Sally Schmidt0541% games−6.2% vs expected
Thomas Chillinsky + Carol Poe3545% games−14.1% vs expected
Cecil Mullins + Deborah Pearson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Schmidt
158W–90L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carol Poe
234W–171L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Andrew Garofoli
89W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Deborah Pearson
125W–132L career · 1 line in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.50
Lindsay Bremar
133W–140L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
David Garofoli
41W–50L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Chillinsky
32W–61L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
James Bremar
68W–92L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Chetana Wilkins
81W–92L career · 1 line in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Cecil Mullins
69W–83L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Kathe Mullins
196W–75L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Termuhlen
0W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Balmer
71W–75L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
VIcky Lee
43W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.