Teams

FSSC-Anderson

2023 OH OV SUMMER Mixed 18&O Dayton · 2023 MXD 18&O 7.0 Dayton

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-21vs SRTC-GarofoliLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Hawley / Rachel Hawley vs Andrew Garofoli / Deborah Pearson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-15vs STC-RitzeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Taylor / Stacie Remaly vs Kyle Webb / Teresa Day1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Hawley / Rachel Hawley vs Sara Robbins / Mason Hagen4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Alfes / Staci Alfes vs Dave Moravek / Anna Brown6-3, 6-2
2023-06-09vs KTC-PittsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Hawley / Rachel Hawley vs Lauren Keeley / Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStaci Alfes / Bradley Paynter vs Hugh Quill / Eileen Tollefson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Alfes / Jan Wineberg vs Lucy Moore / Edward Kimball4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-06-03vs KTC-GramzaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Nagel / Suzanne Loudner Wittmer vs Tristan Handler / Brooke Grider4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBradley Paynter / Kelsey Schuering vs Peggy van Deursen / Philip Vandeursen6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJessica Anderson / Krishna Agarwal vs Patrick Gill / Jill Bramini3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 MXD 18&O 7.0 Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Chris Compton
published 4
3.78
Rachel Hawley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Bradley Paynter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Sam Dowse
published
3.31
Kyle Nagel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Jan Wineberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Stacie Remaly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Staci Alfes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Kelsey Schuering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Jamie Compton
published 3.5
3.06
Krishna Agarwal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Megan Popp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Robert Hawley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Adam Remaly
published 3
2.65
Julie Bodnar
published
Luke Wibowo
published
Mark Alfes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Loudner Wittmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Hawley + Robert Hawley3647% games−6.9% vs expected
Chris Compton + Megan Popp4160% gamesnot enough data
Mark Alfes + Staci Alfes134 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Nagel + Jan Wineberg033 matchesnot enough data
Robert Hawley + Staci Alfes033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Compton + Jamie Compton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Compton
100W–59L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Rachel Hawley
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.78
4
Bradley Paynter
42W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Sam Dowse
58W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kyle Nagel
69W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Jan Wineberg
157W–266L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Stacie Remaly
105W–126L career · 1 line in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Staci Alfes
50W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelsey Schuering
80W–79L career · 1 line in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Jamie Compton
86W–100L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Krishna Agarwal
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
Megan Popp
68W–80L career · 1 line in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Robert Hawley
73W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Adam Remaly
32W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Bodnar
66W–118L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Luke Wibowo
12W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Alfes
15W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Loudner Wittmer
56W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.