Teams

HRCA AQUA

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs HW BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesAudra Calzaretta / Tara Simmons vs Meredith van Wyk / Jill Smith6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHelen Lazzell vs SARA CONWAY6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDee Zimmerman / Danielle Butler vs Stacy Masur / Shawna Saussus7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIleen Cummiskey / Ruby Fast vs Daniele Dattilo / Melissa Miller6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-14vs HG REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Bryson / Michelle Millet vs Whitney Cain / Kristin Morris7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRuby Fast vs Mary Dewar6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHelen Lazzell / Danielle Butler vs Kristen Dimig / Patricia Nowlan6-0, 5-4
L#3 DoublesIleen Cummiskey / Leann Washabaugh vs Kelly Harrison / Katy Adler3-6, 2-6
2022-07-07vs HV PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Keller / Kelly Bryson vs Kathy Shepherd / Holly Gant6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRuby Fast vs Angela Martorella6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanielle Butler / Helen Lazzell vs Amy Dawson / Kris LaValley6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIleen Cummiskey / Leann Washabaugh vs Stephanie Wilcox / Heather Mantel6-2, 6-0
2022-06-30vs LTFC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichelle Millet / Tara Simmons vs Shelley Chism / Darlene Jensen-Walker6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDee Zimmerman vs Joane Keran7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Keller / Kelly Bryson vs Theresa Gilpatrick / Elizabeth Zenk6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHelen Lazzell / Ruby Fast vs Alison Cejka / Linda Murray6-3, 6-2
2022-06-23vs CACI BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Keller / Michelle Millet vs Angela D'Alessandro / Donna Chan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAudra Calzaretta vs Crystal Hostelley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeann Washabaugh / Danielle Butler vs Allison Stewart / Carrie Bryan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-16vs HFII REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Keller / Kelly Bryson vs Kim MacKendrick / Heather Dewey6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Millet / Tara Simmons vs Christine McCarthy / Emily Zadvorny6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanielle Butler / Ileen Cummiskey vs Bonnie Mccoumb / Sissy Jasper3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-09vs SSLT BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesDee Zimmerman / Leann Washabaugh vs Susie Taylor / Janet Swanson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Millet vs Karen Ramon7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Bryson / Tara Simmons vs Kristie Gill / Suzanne Kwilman6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRuby Fast / Ileen Cummiskey vs Ellen Shoemaker / Pamela Probst6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HRCA AQUA7023518191
2CM PINK34141430236
3PH NAVY25111734272
4DTP GREEN25111737272
5HV PINK0791944291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Michelle Millet
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.45
Helen Lazzell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Amy Keller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Audra Calzaretta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Dee Zimmerman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Tara Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Danielle Butler
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Ileen Cummiskey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leann Washabaugh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ruby Fast
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Lazzell + Ruby Fast10168% games+12.5% vs expected
Helen Lazzell + Ileen Cummiskey5155% games+6.7% vs expected
Helen Lazzell + Amy Keller4556% games+5.4% vs expected
Amy Keller + Ruby Fast13958% games+5.3% vs expected
Helen Lazzell + Danielle Butler17161% games+4.0% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Audra Calzaretta5359% games+3.9% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Amy Keller9257% games+3.4% vs expected
Danielle Butler + Tara Simmons18856% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Millet
83W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Helen Lazzell
159W–99L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Amy Keller
87W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Audra Calzaretta
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dee Zimmerman
45W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tara Simmons
81W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Danielle Butler
119W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Ileen Cummiskey
34W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leann Washabaugh
36W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruby Fast
61W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.