Teams

CACI BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs HV PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Diana Zoeller vs Angela Martorella / Holly Gant4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Joby Koren vs Ashley Festoso / Kris LaValley4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAllison Stewart / Heidi Kelly vs Mim Lyles / Leisha Andersen6-1, 7-6
2022-07-19vs HW BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Allison Stewart vs Jill Smith / Kim Williams1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs SARA CONWAY4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Diana Zoeller vs Melanie Adams / Stacy Masur6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDonna Chan / Heidi Kelly vs Meredith van Wyk / Daniele Dattilo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-14vs SSLT BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Donna Chan vs Susie Taylor / Janet Swanson6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Kristie Gill7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Virginia Hinds vs Pamela Probst / Suzanne Kwilman4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAllison Stewart / Jennifer Benson vs Roberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker7-5, 6-1
2022-07-07vs LTFC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Allison Stewart vs Shelley Chism / Darlene Jensen-Walker7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCrystal Hostelley / Sherri Hartman vs Elizabeth Zenk / Theresa Gilpatrick6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Heidi Kelly vs Alison Cejka / Margaret Fuller4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-23vs HRCA AQUAWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela D'Alessandro / Donna Chan vs Amy Keller / Michelle Millet6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Audra Calzaretta6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Stewart / Carrie Bryan vs Leann Washabaugh / Danielle Butler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-16vs HG REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAllison Stewart / Angela D'Alessandro vs Kelly Harrison / Kristin Morris2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVirginia Hinds vs Kari Tweden4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Chan / Crystal Hostelley vs Vida Melvin / Kristen Dimig6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Diana Zoeller vs Sarah Bernauer / Mary Dewar6-3, 6-4
2022-06-09vs HFII REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennifer Benson / Joby Koren vs Melissa Wern / Lauren Landen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCrystal Hostelley vs Sissy Jasper6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Diana Zoeller vs Kara Carey / Emily Zadvorny6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Chan / Virginia Hinds vs Linda Staples / Christine McCarthy6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Carrie Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Donna Chan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Heidi Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Angela D'Alessandro
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Benson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Diana Zoeller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Crystal Hostelley
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.92
Joby Koren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Sherri Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Virginia Hinds
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joby Koren + Sherri Hartman5252% games+9.0% vs expected
Angela D'Alessandro + Donna Chan6161% games+5.9% vs expected
Carrie Bryan + Diana Zoeller191553% games−0.1% vs expected
Carrie Bryan + Joby Koren4251% games−6.9% vs expected
Joby Koren + Heidi Kelly1441% games−8.3% vs expected
Crystal Hostelley + Donna Chan3348% games−9.1% vs expected
Carrie Bryan + Heidi Kelly3257% gamesnot enough data
Joby Koren + Jennifer Benson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carrie Bryan
113W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Donna Chan
44W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Heidi Kelly
56W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Angela D'Alessandro
99W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Benson
59W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Diana Zoeller
52W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Crystal Hostelley
37W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Joby Koren
57W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Sherri Hartman
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Virginia Hinds
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.