Teams

KY/LEX/Begley-Fakharpour

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-28vs KY/Lex/Yates-BakerLost 12
L#1 DoublesNina Begley / Lynn Littrell vs Sienna Hooper / Emily Diehl5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBetty Grey / Mary Fakharpour vs Lynn Schlumpf / Aurora Kikrsey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Ferlan / Sally Baker vs Lola Baker / Marcia Foster6-2, 6-2
2025-02-08vs KY/Lex/Simpson-GallagherWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Mullins / Lynn Littrell vs Amanda Ferguson / Monica Mestanza7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Diggins / Miemie Dorfling vs Regina Covington / Toni Halley6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBetty Grey / Mary Fakharpour vs Rhonda Hilton / Olive Gallagher1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-31vs KY/Lex/Yates-BakerLost 12
L#1 DoublesNina Begley / Monica Mullins vs Lola Baker / Sienna Hooper5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSally Baker / Mary Ferlan vs Aurora Kikrsey / Lynn Schlumpf2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Luchsinger / Betty Grey vs Kay Yates / Marcia Foster6-3, 6-4
2025-01-04vs KY/Lex/Simpson-GallagherWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Diggins / Amy Cunningham vs Elizabeth Doss / Amanda Ferguson7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Luchsinger / Sally Baker vs Toni Halley / Regina Covington6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMiemie Dorfling / Jennifer Sizemore vs Victoria Greenwell / Amy Schenck6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jana Brooking
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Luchsinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Lynn Littrell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Monica Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Mary Diggins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Mary Ferlan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Betty Grey
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.97
Sally Baker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Leslie Nuckols
published
2.74
Archna Johnson
published 3
Jennifer Sizemore
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Fakharpour
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Miemie Dorfling
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Nina Begley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Mullins + Nina Begley1447% games+0.7% vs expected
Mary Ferlan + Archna Johnson4252% games−0.5% vs expected
Mary Diggins + Amy Luchsinger3350% games−2.8% vs expected
Lynn Littrell + Jana Brooking7654% games−5.3% vs expected
Mary Ferlan + Betty Grey4156% games−6.8% vs expected
Mary Diggins + Nina Begley0527% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fakharpour + Betty Grey0531% gamesnot enough data
Mary Diggins + Monica Mullins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jana Brooking
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Amy Luchsinger
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Littrell
17W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Monica Mullins
17W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Mary Diggins
20W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Mary Ferlan
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Betty Grey
14W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Sally Baker
7W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Leslie Nuckols
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Archna Johnson
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Jennifer Sizemore
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Fakharpour
3W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miemie Dorfling
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nina Begley
11W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.