Teams

KY/Lex/Simpson-Gallagher

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-28vs KY/LEX/BaileyMangoldLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegina Covington / Olive Gallagher vs Katherine Hornback / Lori Tenney3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Doss / Rhonda Hilton vs Anna Mayne / Robbie Doctrow0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Simpson / Toni Halley vs Ann Denny / Debra Gevedon2-6, 3-6
2025-02-25vs KY/LEX/SENTERSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Rhonda Hilton vs Doris Senters / Yvonne Conner2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Simpson / Amy Schenck vs Karen Sandberg / Kelly Kubajak2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Robinson / Lee Ann Sheehy vs Lee Walker / Ann Albrecht3-6, 3-6
2025-02-20vs KY/Lex/Yates-BakerLost 02
L#1 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Olive Gallagher vs Aurora Kikrsey / Lynn Schlumpf1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Covington / Amy Schenck vs Emily Diehl / Ria Voth2-6, 3-6
2025-02-08vs KY/LEX/Begley-FakharpourLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Ferguson / Monica Mestanza vs Monica Mullins / Lynn Littrell5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Covington / Toni Halley vs Mary Diggins / Miemie Dorfling2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Olive Gallagher vs Betty Grey / Mary Fakharpour6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-30vs KY/LEX/BaileyMangoldLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegina Covington / Monica Mestanza vs Martha Martin / Robbie Doctrow2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Simpson / Olive Gallagher vs Debra Gevedon / Katherine Hornback2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Schenck / Lee Ann Sheehy vs Shera Moulton / Susan Miller3-6, 0-6
2025-01-26vs KY/Lex/Yates-BakerLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Simpson / Regina Covington vs Sienna Hooper / Emily Diehl3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Kathy Robinson vs Lola Baker / Ikuko Nakanishi5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLee Ann Sheehy / Victoria Greenwell vs Kay Yates / Ria Voth0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-17vs KY/LEX/SENTERSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Mestanza / Regina Covington vs Doris Senters / Connie Bishop4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesOlive Gallagher / Diana Simpson vs Yvonne Conner / Cathy Corales3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Robinson / Elizabeth Doss vs Lisa Deaton / Lee Walker5-7, 4-6
2025-01-04vs KY/LEX/Begley-FakharpourLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Doss / Amanda Ferguson vs Mary Diggins / Amy Cunningham5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesToni Halley / Regina Covington vs Amy Luchsinger / Sally Baker1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Greenwell / Amy Schenck vs Miemie Dorfling / Jennifer Sizemore0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Olive Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.04
Amanda Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Regina Covington
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.79
Amy Schenck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Monica Mestanza
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.77
Diana Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Lee Ann Sheehy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.65
Toni Halley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Elizabeth Doss
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Victoria Greenwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Simpson + Regina Covington1538% games+1.9% vs expected
Toni Halley + Regina Covington1442% games−2.7% vs expected
Regina Covington + Monica Mestanza134 matchesnot enough data
Diana Simpson + Toni Halley033 matchesnot enough data
Diana Simpson + Amy Schenck033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Doss + Regina Covington213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Doss + Amy Schenck213 matchesnot enough data
Olive Gallagher + Rhonda Hilton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olive Gallagher
13W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Amanda Ferguson
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Regina Covington
16W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Rhonda Hilton
39W–48L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Amy Schenck
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Monica Mestanza
5W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
3
Diana Simpson
6W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lee Ann Sheehy
17W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Toni Halley
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Elizabeth Doss
14W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Greenwell
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.