Teams

SKY GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs WP-O ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesErika Sabatos / Joy Kathleen Murphy vs Libby Brien / Kelly Kurtz7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCatherine Hodges vs AUSRA MOLLERUD4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Gloeckler / Emily Brown vs Neda Rasouli / Kimberly Schnetzer6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCamilla Almuti / Katie Garrison vs Alison Mueller / Sissel Eckenhausen6-3, 6-4
2026-07-09vs PTC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesCamilla Almuti / Erika Sabatos vs Erika Shorter / Shannon Kleinbach1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKatie Garrison / Kim Foster vs Sarah Crow / Su Mei Chen6-3, 5-6
W#3 DoublesJeffra Frank / Kim Brummond vs Lisa Walko / Gwen O'Connor2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-02vs EM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Katy Kappler / Colley Moe6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJoy Kathleen Murphy vs Kari Hale3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKim Brummond / Erika Sabatos vs Ashley Wolfe / Michele Olree6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hodges / Katie Garrison vs Brilynn Cahill / Kathryn Terry6-4, 6-4
2026-06-25vs ATC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesJoy Kathleen Murphy / Katie Garrison vs Caroline Rassenfoss / Tami Beardsley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Gloeckler vs Sarah Soane6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKim Brummond / Erika Sabatos vs Lucy Dinneen / Martha Solis-Turner7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hodges / Camilla Almuti vs Laurie MacDowell / Bobbie Brandon6-2, 6-2
2026-06-18vs VC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Gloeckler / Emily Brown vs Lindsay Needler-Turner / Shannon Kasperbauer4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesErika Sabatos vs Betsy Bengtson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCamilla Almuti / Catherine Hodges vs Andrea Barry Johnson / Kate Reinemund6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoy Kathleen Murphy / Kim Brummond vs Janney Carpenter / Dana Stehno3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-11vs GCC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesKim Brummond / Joy Kathleen Murphy vs Heidi Kelly / Andrea Howland - Cobb0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Gloeckler vs Emer Dempsey6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErika Sabatos / Katie Garrison vs Allison Kaelberer / Sarah Dennis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hodges / Camilla Almuti vs Rima Hea / Caren Swan7-5, 6-3
2026-06-04vs CHCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJoy Kathleen Murphy / Katie Garrison vs Ann Marie Johnson / Vanessa Ramich6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Gloeckler vs Kelly Koch6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEmily Brown / Kim Brummond vs Julia Brown / Callie Nowicki2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErika Sabatos / Camilla Almuti vs Cindy Wells / Brooke O'Donnell7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kelly Gloeckler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Erika Sabatos
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Kim Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Kim Brummond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Katie Garrison
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Jeffra Frank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Joy Kathleen Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.05
Camilla Almuti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Foster + Erika Sabatos5253% games+10.3% vs expected
Erika Sabatos + Kelly Gloeckler4162% games+10.2% vs expected
Joy Kathleen Murphy + Erika Sabatos6453% games+7.1% vs expected
Camilla Almuti + Erika Sabatos11754% games+2.1% vs expected
Kim Brummond + Joy Kathleen Murphy131649% games+1.4% vs expected
Kim Foster + Joy Kathleen Murphy7951% games−2.6% vs expected
Kim Brummond + Kim Foster4449% games−2.8% vs expected
Kim Brummond + Jeffra Frank3546% games−7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kelly Gloeckler
65W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Erika Sabatos
105W–60L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Catherine Hodges
66W–31L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Kim Foster
33W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Kim Brummond
87W–100L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Katie Garrison
93W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jeffra Frank
30W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Joy Kathleen Murphy
78W–109L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Camilla Almuti
98W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.