Teams

GCC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs EM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEmer Dempsey / Lauren Clough vs Colley Moe / Katy Kappler4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMercedes Degiorgis vs Kari Hale4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Howland - Cobb / Rima Hea vs Brilynn Cahill / Kathryn Terry3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCaren Swan / Tiffany Herrick vs Tammy Terhaar / Ashley Wolfe1-6, 0-6
2026-07-09vs ATC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMercedes Degiorgis / Breanna Hunt vs Tami Beardsley / Megan Lynch6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrea Karp vs Charlotte Petersen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Dennis / Heidi Kelly vs Jody Power / Jackie Brown-Griggs6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Kaelberer / Rima Hea vs Laurie MacDowell / Martha Solis-Turner4-6, 4-6
2026-07-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Dennis / Allison Kaelberer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Clough / Heidi Kelly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Herrick / Caren Swan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-25vs WP-O ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesLauren Clough / Breanna Hunt vs Kelly Kurtz / Angie Demetulias7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTiffany Herrick vs AUSRA MOLLERUD1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Kaelberer / Heidi Kelly vs Claire Joyce / Catherine Kraft2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRima Hea / Caren Swan vs Neda Rasouli / Kimberly Schnetzer2-6, 1-6
2026-06-18vs CHCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Andrea Howland - Cobb vs Stacey Knox / Vanessa Ramich0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Karp vs Kelly Koch6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLauren Clough / Allison Kaelberer vs Callie Nowicki / Julia Brown2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRima Hea / Tiffany Herrick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-11vs SKY GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Andrea Howland - Cobb vs Kim Brummond / Joy Kathleen Murphy6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEmer Dempsey vs Kelly Gloeckler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Kaelberer / Sarah Dennis vs Erika Sabatos / Katie Garrison6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRima Hea / Caren Swan vs Catherine Hodges / Camilla Almuti5-7, 3-6
2026-06-04vs PTC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesLauren Clough / Emer Dempsey vs Sarah Crow / Shannon Kleinbach6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Karp vs Erika Shorter6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Dennis / Heidi Kelly vs Christina Good / Marcela Lopez6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBreanna Hunt / Mercedes Degiorgis vs Emily Yeingst / Gwen O'Connor6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Andrea Karp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Breanna Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Lauren Clough
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Mercedes Degiorgis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Emer Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Heidi Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Andrea Howland - Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Rima Hea
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Allison Kaelberer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Caren Swan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Tiffany Herrick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Clough + Allison Kaelberer6552% games+5.8% vs expected
Lauren Clough + Emer Dempsey16561% games+3.8% vs expected
Rima Hea + Andrea Howland - Cobb9652% games+2.9% vs expected
Rima Hea + Tiffany Herrick1550% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Kelly + Andrea Howland - Cobb4160% gamesnot enough data
Allison Kaelberer + Emer Dempsey3251% gamesnot enough data
Rima Hea + Allison Kaelberer224 matchesnot enough data
Mercedes Degiorgis + Breanna Hunt404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Karp
32W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.58
3.5
Breanna Hunt
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Lauren Clough
36W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Mercedes Degiorgis
50W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Emer Dempsey
86W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Heidi Kelly
28W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Howland - Cobb
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Rima Hea
66W–81L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Allison Kaelberer
95W–101L career · 5 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Caren Swan
146W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Tiffany Herrick
25W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.