Teams

V - Sherwood CC

2022 USTA Adult 65 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesTeresa Zobrist / Marti Spencer vs Marie Smith / Suzanne Hartz4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConnie Mundell / Beth Bearer vs Sharon McBee / Rosemary Gervais7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTeresa Zobrist / Marti Spencer vs Judy Eisenbrand / Grace Berman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesArlene Braun / Beth Bearer vs Claire Aisley / Susan Friedman5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTeresa Zobrist / Susan Whitcomb vs Judy Eisenbrand / Grace Berman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Mundell / Selina Cheng vs Claire Aisley / Susan Friedman3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Hewitson / Rosella Farnum vs Leanne Helfman / Suzanne Hartz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDonna Leidersdorf / Marti Spencer vs Claire Aisley / Renae Saliano3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Hewitson / Teresa Zobrist vs Rosemary Gervais / Renee Kieselbach6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Bearer / Selina Cheng vs Rebeca Fuller / Marion Larkin6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMarti Spencer / Donna Leidersdorf vs Jane Forrester / Lynda Demaray4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Hewitson / Susan Whitcomb vs Suzanne Hartz / Marie Smith3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Mundell / Teresa Zobrist vs Sharon McBee / Leanne Helfman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSelina Cheng / Marti Spencer vs Leanne Helfman / Renae Saliano6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Beth Bearer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Marti Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Teresa Zobrist
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Selina Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Donna Leidersdorf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Arlene Braun
published 3
2.66
Connie Mundell
published 3
Marilyn Hewitson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Leidersdorf + Marti Spencer10951% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Bearer
87W–129L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Marti Spencer
144W–198L career · 5 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Teresa Zobrist
69W–133L career · 5 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Selina Cheng
54W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3.5
Donna Leidersdorf
37W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Arlene Braun
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Connie Mundell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Marilyn Hewitson
14W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.