Teams

Eastern/Zhou.5.0TriW

2024 Tri-Level Metro · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.44 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-05vs BindlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Garfield / Roslyn Chua-Mcalonie vs Caitlyn Frankel / Sarah Horn3-6, 5-7
2024-06-02vs BindlerWon 20
W#1 DoublesRose Schlecker / Janie Marcus vs Robin Lieberman / Jacqueline Clark6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaddi Hurley / Wenchun Wu vs Kathy Rey / Skyler Simson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-29vs BindlerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSanae Oyama Diller / Rose Schlecker vs Mckenzie Collins / Sarah Horn6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWenchun Wu / Paddi Hurley vs Lily Davis / Mary Evelyn Carroll1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-05-08vs BindlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJean-Na Koo / Karen Garfield vs Natalia Bray / Mckenzie Collins4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKuntal Joshi / Janine Sadaka vs Sara Lazarevic / Robin Lieberman7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-30vs Korngut/MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Frantz / Skyler Simson vs Bonnie Ding / Katherine Martin6-1, 6-3
2024-04-26vs BindlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSanae Oyama Diller / Regi Monroe vs Sarah Horn / Caitlyn Frankel7-6, 6-6
2024-04-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Tang / Zoe Chen - (DQ) vs Jennifer Rudd / Federica Sartori6-1, 6-3
2024-04-09vs BindlerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Garfield / Jean-Na Koo vs Mckenzie Collins / Sarah Horn7-5, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Sokol / Wenchun Wu vs Lily Davis / Zoe Chen1-6, 4-6
2024-03-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Frantz / Sheridan Scholtz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-01vs HumphreyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenni Bourque / Anna Tang vs Linda Humphrey / Kristin Franchock1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Karen Garfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.45
Rose Schlecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Roslyn Chua-Mcalonie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Jean-Na Koo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Regi Monroe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.30
Huan Zhou
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Wenchun Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Untch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.24
Janine Sadaka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Brittney Eady
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Kuntal Joshi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Courtney Sokol
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.90
Anna Tang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Lisa Frantz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Paddi Hurley
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
Janie Marcus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sanae Oyama Diller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Schlecker + Amy Untch13169% games+16.8% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Brittney Eady5259% games+7.2% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Amy Untch15759% games+6.6% vs expected
Paddi Hurley + Lisa Frantz5454% games+5.5% vs expected
Amy Untch + Huan Zhou6360% games−2.4% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Huan Zhou8358% games−3.4% vs expected
Paddi Hurley + Anna Tang2645% games−4.7% vs expected
Amy Untch + Brittney Eady5251% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Karen Garfield
45W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.59
Rose Schlecker
46W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
4.45
Roslyn Chua-Mcalonie
66W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.42
Jean-Na Koo
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
4.42
Regi Monroe
69W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Huan Zhou
125W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
Wenchun Wu
115W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Amy Untch
128W–67L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Janine Sadaka
33W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Brittney Eady
117W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
Kuntal Joshi
69W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Courtney Sokol
70W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
4.00
4.5
Anna Tang
166W–107L career · 6 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.90
4
Lisa Frantz
210W–119L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Paddi Hurley
240W–203L career · 7 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
Janie Marcus
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Sanae Oyama Diller
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.